Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1871 and 1881 census
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jennifer | Report | 3 Dec 2009 14:36 |
|
I am looking for Joseph W Poat on the 1871 and 1881 census to try to establish his parents. I have found him on the 1891 and 1911 census where he is married and has his family. From that he says he was born Limehouse [London] and from his age on those census and when he died I think he was born around 1867 to 1869. I can't find his birth registered but I believe it wasn't compulsory until 1875 so that may not be significant. |
|||
|
Christina | Report | 3 Dec 2009 15:35 |
|
Take a look at Joseph DOODY on the 1881 census he is with his mother Marian age 35 and also a boarder named Charles Poat aged 27. I rather think your Joseph has taken on a stepfathers name after her remarriage. |
|||
|
Barbara | Report | 3 Dec 2009 15:38 |
|
Could this be his marriage if Doody? |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 3 Dec 2009 15:49 |
|
Peter Doody marrried Mary Ann Jelley (sic) 1873 Sep Q Holborn 1b 1052 |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 3 Dec 2009 16:01 |
|
|
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 3 Dec 2009 16:02 |
|
Thank you all for your help. That certainly gives me food for thought. I had seen the marriage of Joseph and Elizabeth and son Thomas and thought that there must be some tie up but could not confirm it. However the stepfather link looks very promising. I am so grateful as it would never have occured to me. |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 3 Dec 2009 16:09 |
|
Thank you Maureen. You were putting your reply on while I was writing my previous thank you. You are so right because I could not find him on the 1901 census either and of course he was then calling himself Doody. I wish he had made his mind up what he was called! |
|||
|
Christina | Report | 3 Dec 2009 16:15 |
|
Just found baptism for Joseph William JELLEY!! 17th August 1868 St Pancras Old Church Campden - mothers name Mary Ann Jelley - appears she was unmarried when she had Joseph - yet another name!! |
|||
|
Christina | Report | 3 Dec 2009 16:17 |
|
1881 census |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 3 Dec 2009 16:33 |
|
Sorry Christina but what I meant was how did you first search when you did not know he was a Doody. |
|||
|
Christina | Report | 3 Dec 2009 16:47 |
|
Sorry Jenny misread what you wanted - complete accident really - some had put an alternative name (well 2 actually) on the Ancestry site so I did some checking. Have just found the marriage for Peter Doody and Mary Ann Jelley on Ancestry - it was 28th July 1873 Peter was a photographer and his father was also Peter (a tailor), Mary Ann a spinster and her fathers name was William but recorded as deceased. |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 3 Dec 2009 17:00 |
|
Thank you again Christina. Final challenge. Can you find Mary Ann and Joseph on the 1871 census? I have been looking since four o'clock and I can't find her. |
|||
|
Christina | Report | 3 Dec 2009 17:36 |
|
nothing yet Jenny - I'll keep looking but probably tomorrow now! It's always worth trying wildcard names as it could easily have been mistranscribed. Take a look on the Familysearch site, you will find the baptism for Mary Ann Jelley (Rudgwick Sussex) and if you then type in parents names with surname and doubl;e click on batch number you will get all her siblings. |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 3 Dec 2009 19:28 |
|
1851 Rudgwick Street |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 3 Dec 2009 19:46 |
|
Parents of Mary Ann |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 3 Dec 2009 23:17 |
|
Must say I'm a little suspicious of this family in 1871: |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 4 Dec 2009 12:37 |
|
Thank you Gillian and Maureen. I agree that your 1871 census looks a very very likely candidate. |
|||