Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
HOLMES MARY
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jean | Report | 14 Aug 2010 22:53 |
|
Still trying to work this out and Please if anybody can help me I will more than appreciate it. |
|||
|
Mistycat | Report | 6 Aug 2010 12:33 |
|
No it would not give a previous husbands name, would just state she was a widow.... |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 6 Aug 2010 00:14 |
|
I now know That Mary's surname was Whiting when she married Thomas Paxton in 1916. mariiage reg: WD 8b 728. |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 8 May 2010 11:38 |
|
Yes I agree with you. They seem to change names and I have found places they were born in alter as well. |
|||
|
Mistycat | Report | 8 May 2010 00:34 |
|
Hi Ziggy |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 7 May 2010 23:25 |
|
|
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 7 May 2010 23:24 |
|
Is this the cert you have? |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 7 May 2010 22:28 |
|
Well I am more confused than ever. I have found that the Mary Agnes Holmes who married a George William Whiting 8b 667 in 1886. and a Mary Agnes Whiting married a Thomas Paxton 8b 667 in 1916. Is this a coincidence. or what. all other census and her birth certificate have her as MARY HOLMES no Agnes on anything.. |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 7 May 2010 01:13 |
|
Thank you for all this info |
|||
|
Mistycat | Report | 6 May 2010 23:58 |
|
Just a thought...... maybe they were not married in 1911 !! (Mary may have told a fib and they had been living together for 6 yrs ) |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 6 May 2010 15:35 |
|
have Mary's death cert. She died the widow of Thomas PAXTON in 1938. Present at her death was stepdaughter Sarah Ann Ratcliffe ( who was thomas's daughter) |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 18 Apr 2010 14:47 |
|
Yes I think that deathcert. is the correct one. Because I know most of the family lived in Gt. Crosby and quite alot our buried in in St. Lukes Cemetry. So I am going to send for that cert and fingers crossed maybe it will open up a few more names for my tree. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 17 Apr 2010 00:21 |
|
If the death cert that Mary B. found is the correct one, then it should tell you who her husband was. That would help to find the marriage. |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 16 Apr 2010 19:41 |
|
Death for a Mary Paxton in Crosby 1938 age 73 = 1865 so that fits . |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 16 Apr 2010 18:03 |
|
Clutching at straws but the age and birth location fit. ??? |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 16 Apr 2010 17:42 |
|
The 1911census have mary living at 1 Lanigan Place, Great Crosby, Lancs. Her husband is not reg. there. |
|||
|
Contrary Mary | Report | 16 Apr 2010 14:27 |
|
This looks to be her parents in 1881......doesn't help to find Mary though :-)) |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 16 Apr 2010 14:11 |
|
I don't think it would say on 1911 census if Mary had children or not,it is usually the head of the households children that is numbered. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 16 Apr 2010 13:59 |
|
I think this is stretching it a bit - but who knows! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 16 Apr 2010 13:47 |
|
Hi, Thanks for your help I do have the info on the rest of her family, I'ts just I cannot fill the gap between 1871 and 1911 regarding where Mary Holmes was. There is no middle name on her birth. cert.. On the 1911 census whilst living in George Henry Holmes (her brother) address, it states she has been married for six years. ( she could have been married previously ?) she does not have any children, according to 1911 census. |
|||