| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!)
|
Report
|
13 Mar 2009 12:56 |
|
This is a total longshot - but if Rose had been married before and someone misheard Fred's name:
Marriages Dec 1898 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brown Harriet Eliza Dover 2a 2271 Cuthbert Henry Fleetwood Dover 2a 2271 Hayward Frederick William J Dover 2a 2271 YOUNGS Rose Dover 2a 2271
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
13 Mar 2009 12:41 |
|
Hi Evie I have followed your lead and although it has taken time, thankfully you were right that my Fred in Dover in 1901 & 1911 was born in Freiston Lincolnshire in 1865 and is not the Fred also from Lincolnshire born in 1860/1861. Unfortunately this means in my view that other people's trees are incorrect. Thank you again for all your help. It was very much appreciated as was the contributions from the others who offered advice. Allan
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
1 Mar 2009 00:26 |
|
Major night owl. Born at 9 pm, awake all night, slept all day, and my poor mother was never able to break me of it. ;)
I'm still confused here, Andrew. This is the Fred I'm suggesting for yours:
Name: Fred Harrod Age: 16 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865 Relation: Son Father's Name: Henry Mother's Name: Mary A. Where born: Lincoln, England
and you say the date's iffy -- but that's the same year of birth as in the 1901!
and it looks like this birth:
Births Dec 1864 Harrod Fred Lincoln 7a 450
and this is the *other* one:
Births Dec 1860 HARROD Frederic William Boston 7a 319
-- and *he* is the one who married Goulding.
Lincoln district has a Sudbrooke. And a Whisby. And West Firsby, and a Saxby. Sometimes one could choke those enumerators. Why couldn't people just have written in block letters like we do now??
|
|
Vicci
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 08:10 |
|
Lincolnshire towns and parishes
http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/LIN/parishes.html
there is a place called Sibsey in Boston reg dist
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 01:53 |
|
Hi I had previously checked the 1911 and Rose's place of birth is Sutton St James which is near Wisbech. I've also previously googled the Sydds and Lydds. There is a Tydd but it doesn't look like a T. I will check out the other Fred but the date looks a bit iffy. Thanks anyway. Are you a night owl or outside UK?
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 01:10 |
|
Also note that your (?) Fred had a stepmother in 1881.
This is the household in 1871:
Henry Harrod 38 Sarah Harrod 15 Elizabeth Harrod 13 George Harrod 9 Fred Harrod 7 John Harrod 4
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 01:07 |
|
Okay, I haven't quite made it away yet. ;)
I think you're slightly confused about the Lincolnshire Freds. FredS, that is. Two of 'em in 1881.
The one who may be yours:
Name: Fred Harrod Age: 16 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865 Relation: Son Father's Name: Henry Mother's Name: Mary A. Where born: Lincoln, England
And the "other" one:
Name: Fred Harrod Age: 20 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1861 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary A. Where born: Sibsey ((Spilsby)), Lincoln, England
Part of my problem is that I don't know Lincolnshire and I can't tell what the places of birth say for your Fred and Rose in 1901.
Fred's looks like Sipsy or Lipsy. It's hard to tell, because the "L" in Lincolnshire and the "S" in Scotland on the same page are identical, and the first letter of Sipsy or Lipsy doesn't look like either of them. Maybe it's something else altogether.
Rose's looks like Sydd. Or, you know, Lydd. ;) The letter is the same as the "L" in Lincolnshire and the "S" in Scotland.
Having a birth place is such a help for tracking back. Go buy credits for 1911 and see what it says there!
And you're welcome, of course.
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:52 |
|
Sorry Eviebeavie my manners. Thank you for your help tonight. Allan
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:50 |
|
Hi yes the 1901 and 1911 one (married to Rose) is definately mine. Before 1894 I get drawn to the Lincoln one but have had contact with four others of that tree line and they have Fred marrying Mary Goulding and having different children (one of which ironically is a Fred but born I believe 1889) so a different family altogether. My line just disappears. Maybe they never married. My GF always joked his line was illegitimate but maybe he wasn't joking.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:39 |
|
Which one is the other Fred?
Not that 1881 one -- the other Fred is there alongside him in the census:
Name: Fred Harrod Age: 20 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1861 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary A. Gender: Male Where born: Sibsey ((Spilsby)), Lincoln, England Occupation: Ag Lab
Your Fred was a Manager, Mineral Water Factory in 1901, and a moulder, iron works in 1881.
Even those two sound like rather different careers ...
You are sure the 1901 one is yours? ;)
Have you checked the 1911 to see whether it has any useful info?
HOUSEHOLD HARROD ROSE F 1874 37 Dover Kent HARROD ALFRED M 1902 9 Dover Kent HARROD DOROTHY F 1894 17 Dover Kent HARROD FRED M 1896 15 Dover Kent HARROD FRED M 1907 4 Dover Kent << ??? mistranscribed age? HARROD ISIBELLA F 1907 4 Dover Kent HARROD JOHN M 1900 11 Dover Kent
But you'd have to pay to see details.
I think I've gone in as many circles as I can tonight - I'm hungry! Thank you for answering, and I'll check for more tomorrow.
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:33 |
|
Hi That is the 'other' Fred who married a Mary Goulding. I have been down that route to my cost.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:25 |
|
Nope. The surname is clear at Ancestry.
But ... it's coincidental. It *could* be a mistranscription from the original entry ...
Just to add that Victoria had also provided him in the 1881:
Name: Henry Harrod Age: 49 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1832 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary A. Where born: Freeston, Lincoln, England Condition as to marriage: Married Occupation: Smith (B)
Civil Parish: Lincoln County/Island: Lincolnshire
Street address: 22 Thomas Street
Henry Harrod 49 Mary A. Harrod 48 Henry Harrod 21 George Harrod 18 Fred Harrod 16 (moulder iron works)
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:22 |
|
Could this be Fred?
Births Sep 1862 HARRIES Fred William Stamford 7a 2_7
I suspect so. The image is very bad at FreeBMD; can't even guess from alphabetical order because all the surnames in the list are obscured. Gonna go have a look at Ancestry ...
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:10 |
|
I am still here and do appreciate this help.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:07 |
|
Just one refinement on your info -- you know your Harrods were in Kent, and presumably together, by early 1894:
Births Mar 1894 Harrod Dorothy Louisa Dover 2a 992
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:06 |
|
And a great big drat.
1901
Name: Rose Hannah Bell Age: 29 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1872 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: John Thos Where born: Broughton, Lincolnshire, England
Who needed another Rose Bowers from Lincolnshire getting married at basically the same time?
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:04 |
|
In 1901, we have Catherine L Ayre and John W Ayre in Lincolnshire.
So, that Rose Hannah Bowers married John Bell ...
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Feb 2009 00:00 |
|
I make it 1473, and there is indeed a missing bride.
Marriages Dec 1891 Ayre John William Glanford B. 7a 1473 Bell John Thomas Glanford B 7a 1473 Dent Catherine Louisa Glanford B. 7a 1473
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
27 Feb 2009 23:57 |
|
Aha?
Marriages Dec 1891 Bowers Rose Hannah Glanford B. 7a 147*
Let's see whether we can figure out what page that was / who else was on it.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
27 Feb 2009 23:48 |
|
This is such a bad idea, Allen. *You* know all the efforts and results that were in that previous thread. Nobody else does! So now the likely outcome is that people will just start doing it all over again.
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1126627
... Unfortunately, people seem to have engaged in what is, to me, the inexplicable practice of deleting their posts in that thread. So the rest of us couldn't tell what might have been done already anyway.
And then along came ... that one.
Oh well, may as well start afresh. But let's have the info Victoria gave in that thread:
1901 Name: Fred W Harrod Age: 37 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1864 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Rose Where born: Lepsy, Shropshire, England (I believe Victoria was saying it should say Lincolnshire)
Civil Parish: Dover Town: Dover County/Island: Kent Registration district: Dover
Fred W Harrod 37 Rose Harrod 27 Dorothy L Harrod 7 Fred W Harrod 5 John G Harrod 1
|