Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Census look up please - John Warr
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:55 |
|
My goodness David how far back can you go. I thougt you might like to know that from the information you have given me I think I have found someone on the site who have Mary and Joseph on their tree. I have sent them a message to see if I can have access to their tree. |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:47 |
|
1851 |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:40 |
|
Thanks |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:38 |
|
JOS WARR |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:37 |
|
Thanks david I thought Feebrick was rather unusual |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:34 |
|
Births Sep 1843 Banbury 16 15 |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:33 |
|
That is absolutly fantastic. Thanks a lot for your help it is really kind of you. Just thought you might like to know that I am tracing this family for my Godmother who will be 90 this year and she does not know anything of her family so I thought it might be a good present for her to give her a family tree. |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:31 |
|
Agricultural Labourer |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:30 |
|
I thought we had gone back o the bible for a minute with Joseph and Mary. What an unusual name is Freebrick. wonder if it should have been Frederick. |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:28 |
|
1841 poss |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:28 |
|
Heck, what a large family, but then that was not unusual then. Thanks a lot for looking for me. |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:27 |
|
1861 poss |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:27 |
|
Is this the right family?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:26 |
|
1871 |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:26 |
|
1881 |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:24 |
|
1901 |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:23 |
|
1891 |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:21 |
|
Oh yes, sorry. Her name is Martha Warr and she married in London in 1913, she worked at a hotel when she married so I am assuming that she left home rather than the family moving to London before the 1901 census. |
|||
|
David | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:18 |
|
What is her name? |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 14 Mar 2009 10:11 |
|
Please would someone look up John Warr on the censuses. On his daughters Marriage Certificate he is down as a labourer. Her birth was registered in April - June 1883 in Banbury. |
|||