Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Twins?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Janette | Report | 1 Jan 2011 19:46 |
|
There are two children I suspect of being twins. On Free BMD one is said to be found in Vol. 3a Page 318 and other other Vol. 3a Page 318a would this mean they were twins or are several children registered on one page? |
|||
|
Janette | Report | 1 Jan 2011 20:29 |
|
Thanks Susan the family had around 18 children so I'm avoiding sending for a birth certificate wherever possible but if needs must :P Best Wishes for the New Year |
|||
|
mac | Report | 1 Jan 2011 20:37 |
|
Can you give the name, date and area - sometimes the suffix means a late entry hand written at the bottom of the page, ie a late registration or they'd missed it. |
|||
|
Janette | Report | 1 Jan 2011 20:38 |
|
Ernest and George Haydon born 1891 in Congleton or Biddulph depending where you look. |
|||
|
mac | Report | 1 Jan 2011 20:57 |
|
Both are registered Congleton, Q2 1891. Neither are an added entry. |
|||
|
Moody Blue | Report | 1 Jan 2011 20:58 |
|
Looks like twins! |
|||
|
mac | Report | 1 Jan 2011 21:10 |
|
Sorry, don't know who you are tracing, but it looks like Ernest died in infancy: |
|||
|
Janette | Report | 1 Jan 2011 21:10 |
|
Thanks Mac and Moody Blue :) Now what confuses me is looking on IGI Ernest and George's parents are named as William and Mary Jane Haydon. Was it common for errors like this to happen? |
|||
|
Familyfinder | Report | 1 Jan 2011 22:53 |
|
if its submitted there are a lot of errors so if you can check the parish records. |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 1 Jan 2011 23:10 |
|
if you look at the reg on cheshirebmd they have the same Cheshire reg no |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 2 Jan 2011 00:33 |
|
Ann - this would just mean they're on the same page in the local register. |
|||
|
Moody Blue | Report | 2 Jan 2011 11:19 |
|
See what you mean! |
|||
|
Moody Blue | Report | 2 Jan 2011 11:27 |
|
In 1901 their names are different yet again ie: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 2 Jan 2011 11:35 |
|
My grandmother's name was Mary Jane and yet on some documents (including the baptism of my aunt) she is recorded as Sarah Jane. I know a few people who have had the same experience with Mary Jane and Sarah Jane being interchanged for some unknown reason - perhaps the person recording the information just mis-heard. |
|||
|
Janette | Report | 2 Jan 2011 11:39 |
|
Thanks Ann, FairlyFatFairy, Moody Blue |
|||
|
Janette | Report | 2 Jan 2011 11:42 |
|
Thanks Kath, Unusal that so many people have had this same situation, but I am convicned this must be the case and am becoming more so all the time. |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 2 Jan 2011 13:45 |
|
On that Cheshire reg no, the page no I think is 64 of the Congleton register and 95 is the entry no. (tho I am willing to be proved wrong) I am sure I have seen it on Lancs bmd wheretwins have consecutive nos for the last no. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Moody Blue | Report | 2 Jan 2011 18:02 |
|
Births Jun 1847 |
|||