Find Ancestors

Angelsong I,m sorry that your request went on the turn Its not nice to see helpers turned on by another member when its totally uncalled for.

.I,m sorry you may have been made to feel uncomfortable and you should get an apology from the 3rd party too

I'm apologising for you more than anything!!! you should be the one apologising - you just can't button it can you - I've ignored all the snide comments you've made over the past few days but really, you always manage to go one step too far - you ask me to leave you alone and I would with pleasure if you could manage to stop criticising mine and everyone else's posts

glad to see the apology

you did note that Conner was O'Conner in Jane Ann's birth registration?

we enjoyed the search and apologise to you for the upset

Ann

Well I didn't expect all this controversy when I put my request on. I thank all of you who have replied.

Conner seems to change to Connor in some instances.

we all know by now that this poster just likes bringing unpleasantness into threads - we all get on fine and we are not a posse - we do not criticise each other's postings - if someone posts twice it's not the end of the world

can't you see that you are the one who initiates all this backbiting?

Wow! Chrissie!
"Ignorant nasty unfounded accusations"???
That was uncalled for.

ignorant unfounded accusations?

I will be gone now

I reiterate that I see no point in cluttering threads / confusing posters

if Angelsong thinks I can help further, feel free to contact me by clicking on my name !

Happens sometimes Chrissie It often takes some time to find things and I often forget to refresh
We all try to help but if you want to be the sole helper then say so then we wont waste our time

happens sometimes - more often if you have the posting open whilst you search you are unaware of other postings - hardly a criminal offence now is it

Shirley just happens to have done the same

forgiev me Ann of green gables but I posted the _entire_ household in the 1851 census above your post about William Connor ..................

George Connor

England and Wales Census, 1891
birth: Kilnsea, Yorkshire
residence: England

record title: England and Wales Census, 1891
name: George Connor
age: 51
gender: Male
birthplace: Kilnsea, Yorkshire
relationship to head of household: Head

William Connor

England and Wales Census, 1851
birth: Kilnsea

record title: England and Wales Census, 1851
name: William Connor
age: 9
gender: M
birthplace: Kilnsea
relationship to head of household: Son
record type:

the marriage is posted above Shirley !


this is how her birth was entered in the GRO index

Name: Jane Ann O'Conner
Year of Registration: 1848
Quarter of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep
District: Patrington
County: Yorkshire - East Riding
Volume: 23
Page: 78

if you want the parents' names that certificate will tell you

Marriages Jun 1872

Conner Jane Ann Hull 9d 350
Pape Peter Hull 9d 350

1851 for reference


Name: Jane Ann Connor
Age: 2
Estimated birth year: abt 1849
Relation: Daughter
Mother's name: Sarah Connor
Gender: F (Female)
Where born: Kilnsea

Civil Parish: Kilnsea
County/Island: Yorkshire
Country: England
Registration district: Patrington
Sub-registration district: Patrington

Sarah Connor 33
George Connor 11
Willm Connor 9
Mary Ann Connor 6
Sarah Ann Connor 4
Jane Ann Connor 2


have you looked at freebmd for the births and marriages of the people you are interested in?

http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl

(Aggie is a nickname surely for instance)

also the 1881 census is free at Ancestry

Marriages Jun 1872 ??
Conner Jane Ann Hull 9d 350 ??
Esam George Hull 9d 350
Moore Jane Elizabeth Hull view
Pape Peter Hull 9d 350 ??

http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl

You need Jane's marriage certificate to learn her father's name

I don't see the family in the 1841 census or anyone in 1851 shown as born in Kilnsea

do you know what other place name might have been given as birthplace ?

Sorry Chrissie, Jane was born 1849. She had a sister in law Jane, and I mistakenly used her dob instead.