Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
marriage of a mr page to elizabeth wainman
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
luckynamoire | Report | 24 Mar 2011 23:47 |
|
hi all, |
|||
|
luckynamoire | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:04 |
|
sorry than should be 1841 and 1851! |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:05 |
|
from familysearch |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:09 |
|
Possible death for William ? |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:14 |
|
THOMAS WAINMAN PAGE |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:15 |
|
I wanted to figure out what registration district Armely is in, to check for Page deaths at |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:16 |
|
|
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:16 |
|
And Mike was typing as I was searching -- coming at it from the other end, I was about to look for a marriage to match the death. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:21 |
|
|
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:22 |
|
Where is Eliza Page 1839 in 1841?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:28 |
|
I was thinking the same thing! -- born in Leeds, Yks, and coincidentally ended up in Leeds, Kent?? I thought it was one of Ancestry's stupidities, but it seems to be what the original is. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:33 |
|
Speaking as a Lancastrian, I couldn't possibly comment !!!!! |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:37 |
|
Now that you mention it.... ..you got me thinking maybe that's the wrong Eliza Page .... but had another look and can't see any other possible. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:42 |
|
And 1851 ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:46 |
|
You leapt too fast, Mike. ;) This is Thomas in 1881: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 25 Mar 2011 00:51 |
|
Was just about to post same census ( will anyway with the details) |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 25 Mar 2011 01:10 |
|
Yeah yeah. ;) I deleted the duplicate -- the problem must have been at my end, because Ancestry was timing out and GR was just churning and not posting ... so I clicked again. And again. Two of 'em took. ;) Apparently it's all the Netflix people watching movies on line and using up my bandwidth ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
luckynamoire | Report | 25 Mar 2011 08:01 |
|
thanks for all the input... yes this is the right family moved to leicester. |
|||
|
luckynamoire | Report | 25 Mar 2011 08:11 |
|
sorry thomas in 1851 would be 14, he married ann ludlum in 1858. |
|||