Find Ancestors

Don't mention legs to our Fanny,please! She'll likely regale you with stories of how she caused a 3 car pile up by flashing hers whilst hitchhiking or something....

Off to stand in dunce corner as well,'cause I don't see Emily in 1881 either.

Maureenxx

Edit-LOVELY day here in NY....

Thank you Kim...OF COURSE Maureen couldnt have found her on 1891 with out my invaluable help..;!

Hope its freezing in NY Mo..;)

Ahhhh bless you you did all the leg work so you've got to take credit for that!!!

Blast...Maureen does it again...I will now go stand in the dunce corner...Grrrrrrrrr

Ha ha the elusive appears thank you so much just 1881 now and all will be complete.

Thanks again

Well I will just have to add her to my mysteries pile!!!

Thanks for all your help trying to find her.

Have a lovely weekend.

She was,Fans...



1891 census transcription details for: 150, North Street, Brighton

National Archive Reference:
RG number: RG12 Piece: 813 Folio: 85 Page: 17


Reg. District: Brighton Sub District: The Palace
Parish: Brighton Enum. District: 5
Ecclesiastical District: St Mary Magdalene City/Municipal Borough: Brighton
Address: 150, North Street, Brighton
County: Sussex
KEYS, William Head Widower M 59 1832 Furniture Packer
Malden
Essex
KEYS, Louisa Daughter Single F 29 1862
Battersea
London
KEYS, Charles Son Single M 20 1871 Drug Store Packer
Battersea
London
MAYLE, Emily Granddaughter F 10 1881 Scholar
Battersea
London


Maureen

Gosh these people amaze me by how much they moved around and how far the distances were with little transport.

Thanks for finding her.

Where they have hidden her on 81 and 91 beats me...I cant see her,even tried under Keys for her in case she was with mothers rellies...

1901

LUSON, Chas Head Married M 68 1833 Living On Own Means
Camberwell
LUSON, Sarah Wife Married F 58 1843
Hastings
Sussex
NOYLE, Emily Louisa Servant Single F 20 1881 General Domestic
Battersea
London

Registration District:
Steyning Sub District:
Shoreham Enumeration District:
43 Ecclesiastical Parish:
Preston St Augustine

Civil Parish:
Preston Municipal Borough:
Address:
174, Springfield Road, Preston County:
Sussex

My apologies I was looking at the baptism year, I think I need new glasses lol.

The 1881 census was taken on 3rd April 1881 and Emily was born on 20th March it says on baptism...So she should be on it..

Name: Emily Louise Noyle
Age: 21
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1883
Spouse Name: Henry Bellamy
Spouse Age: 22
Record Type: Marriage
Marriage Date: 25 Dec 1904
Parish: St Andrew
COUNTY: London
Borough: Enfield
Father Name: Edmund Noyle.........Labourer...AND a witness on marriage...
Spouse Father Name: Arthur Bellamy

Emily was born after the 1881 census so definitely not on that but should be with family on 1891.

Yes that is her I only had details of name from a bible and possibly date of birth up until today then someone found me marriage banns so got father's name and wondered if possible to find siblings before I send for just one cert.

That confirms the date of birth I had.

1881...
And not with them on that either,which she shuld have been as it was taken after her birth going on her baptism...

NOYLE, Edmund Head Married M 32 1849 Bricklayer's Labourer
Vauxhall
Surrey
NOYLE, Elizabeth Wife Married F 27 1854
Newington
Surrey
Registration District:
Wandsworth Sub District:
Battersea Enumeration District:
Ecclesiastical Parish:

Civil Parish:
Battersea Municipal Borough:
Address:
33, Lombard Road, Battersea County:
Surrey

Name: Emeley Louise Noyle
Record Type: Baptism
Estimated Birth Date: abt 1882
Baptism Date: 2 Dec 1882
Father's name: Edward Henry Noyle
Mother's name: Elizabeth Susanna Noyle
Parish or Poor Law Union: Battersea Christ Church
Borough: Wandsworth

Born March 20th 1881...............Address 42 Tugela Road? Father is a labourer...

Do you have Emilys details...When where she was born,who her parents are from her birth cert?

Is this her?

Emily Louise NOYLE 1881 June Qu, Wandsworth

That throws the census result out then but thanks for the marriage details.

Possible but there is no Emily where could she of been as would only of been 10??