Find Ancestors

Hello Stanley,

Christine did e,mail it to me!! but thank you anyway. I just could not get into threads or anything untill today! could not understand why they had it for review either?,,,,, never mind i,m enjoying the moment!!

So glad there are helpful people about in situations like these!!

Flo

Peter Tierney married Florence Mallen. info from freebmd.

Stan

Hello Everyone!! hoorah!! i,m back.

Could not help what happened did not do anything wrong press anything ect!
could not get onto genes could not contact anyone in genes at all when i managed to get into find ancester , well! you know the rest .
I could not get into my threads my tree anything. i had that for a week i did manage 3/4 e,mail,s to Gene,s help line over the week but they were unread.
mind you i have not checked everything yet , threads are ok. just using it now.
thanks again fingers crossed.

p.s. I have just tried them all and there is only Find My Ancester i cannot get into at the moment!

By the way Flick good advice!! thank you!
Flo

Florence..........

Put freebmd in your favourites..and use it for all bmd's between 1837 and approx 1945

http://www.freebmd.org.uk/

Florence may have accidently done it herself... ie pressed the wrong button.

That's O.K. Christine, - at least she has the info now !

She did say in her opening post, which we are at last priveledged to be able to read, that she was having problems accessing her threads etc.
so maybe that was it?

Why on earth that post should have been reported, I really cannot imagine.

Dea x

Flo most likely didnt come back because it had been RRd

I guess it can be quite off putting

Oops - sorry Dea, I have just PM'd it to her, in case she is new and doesn't know how to get back to her thread.

At long last, the question has returned - here is the answer from FreeBMD

Marriages Dec 1914
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ash Matilda Roberts Wolverhampton 6b 1240
Mallen Florence Tierney Wolverhampton 6b 1240 **
ROBERTS George H Ash Wolverhampton 6b 1240
TIERNEY Peter Mallen Wolverhampton 6b 1240 **

Dea x

Sylann it is far better to add to your original thread so that Helpers can see what has already been found and not duplicate this information whilst trying to put the new request into context

Netter to do as Flick suggests and amend the title to reflect more information is required

Whilst it would be an excellent idea for people to point out to posters that their messages may be RR'd....................the fact that so many posters don't return to their threads would mean that such messages would not be seen.

This thread is a perfect example - no sign of Florence since she posted the original............whatever it was!

Sylann...........

When you added to your original thread, did you actually amend the title to say 'update'...or 'further info sought'?

If not, and there had been a lot of replies, it may have been assumed that your query had been dealt with.

Posts are being RRd in the general chat, some have been reinstated. It could be a glitch, but innocent chats about tv programmes are being targetted.

Don't know what is going on!!!!

I reported one recently that was a duplicate...There was no point in telling this particular person as they get abusive when it is pointed out.

I would think it would be off putting to any newbie if this is happening to them without an explaination.

I have no idea what this post contained so I cannot comment either

jax

Maybe I'm too honest for my own good but if I reported a post for review then I would happily own up to the fact that I had done it and post something on the board telling why.

I'm concerned that some new members are having their posts RR and they aren't getting told why or what they have done wrong. They probably think that the members of GR are a bunch of horrible people which couldn't be further from the truth.

Gai

Why can't the person(s) who are indiscriminately reporting posts not just try adding a message to the thread pointing out the possible problem to the poster first? (Or do they not have the gumption to reveal themselves?)

Would be much more constructive and helpful all round.

I do agree that if there is overtly sensitive information then that needs to be remedied, but this latest round of reporting is over the top.

There are a lot of them. Have they been reported as Abuse?

Either it's a GR blip or somebody is taking the *&$$. Oops, I'll get it reported for abuse again!

Goodness knows.....

why

Could some one help me please!

I have come across a marriage for a Peter Tierney to someone named Mallen.,,,,,,,,,, cannot get it up on anc with her first name?
wandered if someone could see on Genes if it has her first name?
1914 WOLVERHAMPTON DEC quart
Thank you!
Here,s hoping i can keep on here long enough!! i can only access trying to find today!! cannot even see my threads .
Flo