Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1891/1901 Census Check please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Joy *The Carlos Cutie of Ilson* | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:32 |
For this fella. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:39 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:40 |
1891 |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:42 |
Possible? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:45 |
Harry being a nickname for Henry? He's a lacemaker but says unmarried. (Edit: Oops, sorry says married, thought it was U for unmarried but it's an M) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:47 |
Deaths Mar 1892 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:50 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 26 Jun 2011 15:55 |
Don't think that could be them in 1911, PH. Married 43 years? That would be 1868. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joy *The Carlos Cutie of Ilson* | Report | 26 Jun 2011 16:01 |
That John (1842) looks like Henry's older brother. ?Marriage to Betsy Walker, 1868 at Southwell. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 26 Jun 2011 16:25 |
Sorry..........meant to add...........A connection? to the 1911..........but the phone rang. :-S |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 26 Jun 2011 17:08 |
Me too, sorry, didn't realize it was John not Henry! |
|||
Researching: |