Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Josephine Rosina Malschinger
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
shipsmate | Report | 24 Feb 2012 16:35 |
|
Dear Chrissiex, I am so sorry ,after my last reply I thought that was the end of the conversation and signed out. I had no idea that you had gone on to find this further informaton. Many thanks for all your help. Shipsmate. |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 17 Oct 2011 13:58 |
|
if you search trees here at genesreunited for |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 17 Oct 2011 02:33 |
|
then in 1871 I wonder ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 17 Oct 2011 02:01 |
|
now ... I wonder about this person |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 17 Oct 2011 01:23 |
|
best to add the connecting link to the other thread |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 17 Oct 2011 01:15 |
|
for info Ancestry has transcribed that 1861 census as |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
shipsmate | Report | 17 Oct 2011 00:04 |
|
IN THAT CASE, I SHALL REMOVE HER UNTIL I FIND THE CENSUS THAT HAD THEM BOTH ON. I KNOW THAT I SAW IT! MANY THANKS, SHIPSMATE. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 16 Oct 2011 23:18 |
|
As MarieCeleste says, the image of the 1861 census could well say Washington for Mary Ann's surname. It certainly doesn't seem to have the right letters to be Malschinger (there doesn't seem to be an "l" before the "s" or a "c" between the "s" and the "h". |
|||
|
shipsmate | Report | 16 Oct 2011 19:41 |
|
IT COULD HAVE BEEN A LATER CENSUS ,I FOUND OUT THAT SHE WAS A NURSE THAT WAY AND SHE AND MARY WERE BOTH ON IT.OF COURSE , NOW I CAN'T FIND IT!! THE NAME MALSCHINGER WAS BROUGHT TO THE U.K. BY 2 BROTHERS IN THE 1800'S AS FAR AS I KNOW, WHICH IS WHY I WAS SURPRISED TO SEE THAT SOMEONE FROM KENT WAS ALSO A MALSCHINGER. SHIPSMATE. |
|||
|
shipsmate | Report | 16 Oct 2011 19:28 |
|
MANY THANKS TO ALL OF YOU , I AM NOW A LOT WISER THAN I WAS REGARDING JOSEPHINE. SHIPSMATE. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 16 Oct 2011 19:23 |
|
Found it! But there's no mention of Josephine/Rosina? |
|||
|
shipsmate | Report | 16 Oct 2011 19:19 |
|
I HAVE THAT CENSUS, THOMAS SUAH B. 1826, HOPTON, SOMERSET, HEAD. 7, NEW CHURCH RD. CAMBERWELL, LONDON. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 16 Oct 2011 19:12 |
|
I'm struggling to find that 1861 census that has Josephine and her mother MAry on it ........ |
|||
|
shipsmate | Report | 16 Oct 2011 19:00 |
|
HI ANNN, AS YOU CAN TELL, I'M NOT MUCH MORE COMPUTER SAVVY THAN I WAS AT THE BEGINNING!! SHIPSMATE. |
|||
|
shipsmate | Report | 16 Oct 2011 18:55 |
|
HI MARIE CELESTE, YES, THAT IS MY TREE. IT WAS ALWAYS ODD TO ME THAT ANN JANNET WAS STILL ALIVE, YET ROSINA WAS DOWN AS HIS SPOUSE. IT SEEMS THAT AFTER HIS DEATH SHE ONCE AGAIN BOARDED AND WENT BACK TO NURSING, SHIPSMATE |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 16 Oct 2011 18:54 |
|
see you already have a Malschinger thread - thought I recalled it - have nudged it up for you - really would have been better to continue wth that one :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
shipsmate | Report | 16 Oct 2011 18:48 |
|
HI, KATHLEEN & MILLIE MOLLIEAMANDA, THANKYOU BOTH SO MUCH, I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR QUITE A WHILE AND YOU ALL MANAGED TO FIND ALL OF THIS IN A MATTER OF MINUTES!! |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 16 Oct 2011 18:48 |
|
The tree on Ancestry that I mentioned says Frederick married Ann Jannet Seymour. EDIT: Sorry - didn't see your response above. |
|||
|
MillymollyAmanda | Report | 16 Oct 2011 18:42 |
|
This one in 1881 |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 16 Oct 2011 18:42 |
|
I think this is her in the 1891 census but her age is transcribed as 37 instead of 57. It also says she IS married:- |
|||