Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Ann Clay
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Christine | Report | 25 Mar 2012 18:08 |
|
Hi Margee |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 25 Mar 2012 17:59 |
|
I still think that she could have remarried claiming to be a widow. The one I posted was in May. Edward's trial was in February. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 25 Mar 2012 17:45 |
|
Hi |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 24 Mar 2012 19:40 |
|
Hi |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Mar 2012 19:36 |
|
Hi Christine - there isn't an 1831 census (apart from a small area of Sheffield). |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 24 Mar 2012 19:34 |
|
HI all |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 24 Mar 2012 17:16 |
|
Wow Chris - Thank you so much, That's fantastic. |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 24 Mar 2012 16:43 |
|
http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/forms/formMain.jsp |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 24 Mar 2012 16:16 |
|
Hi all |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 22 Mar 2012 22:05 |
|
I understand what you are saying but I did say that Ann was possibly pregnant - that was what I was told. It could well be that he stole the bedding for some other reason. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 22 Mar 2012 22:00 |
|
It doesn't quite add up if he was convicted and transported in 1834 but the child was born in 1833. Evidently Ann wasn't pregnant when he left. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 22 Mar 2012 22:00 |
|
Thanks but it was Edward who remarried in Tasmania that listed himself as a widower not Ann. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:55 |
|
There's this marriage of an Ann Rhodes who claims to be a widow. Could it be her? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:54 |
|
Thanks. Just had a look at one of my trees which says that when Edward was transported in 1834 his wife and child were living in Hackney. Also when Edward remarried in 1842 on his marriage certificate it said he was a widower. |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:52 |
|
Good spot Chris |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:49 |
|
Name: Michard Charles Rhodes |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:48 |
|
There's a second copy of the baptism on Ancestry, not so faint. It definitely gives date of birth as 21 Oct. 1833. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:44 |
|
Hi Glitter Baby |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:37 |
|
?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 22 Mar 2012 21:34 |
|
Thanks Chris. This is great. Fits in as Edward was supposedly convicted of stealing bedding for his wife (who was possibly pregnant) and his occupation has been found as tailor/upholsterer. |
|||