Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1901 look up please

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Tox

Tox Report 5 Oct 2006 21:13

Hi, I have found family on 1901 census Emma Jane Hazlett (name varient) Harriet Haylett born 1900 Sculcoates Kate Beatrice Haylett born 1899 Hull Ada Roe born 1886 Litton Staffs RG13/ 4479 Folio 91 page 29. When I view this page RG13/ 4483 appears with none of this family on. Can anyone help please Thanks Tox

Jools

Jools Report 5 Oct 2006 21:18

Tox - I notified ancestry just over 6 weeks ago that the whole of the ED was wrongly linked. Obviously they ain't sorted it yet :(( Jools

Yvonne

Yvonne Report 5 Oct 2006 21:19

Tox Click on one of the other names and then view the image they could be on another page Yvonne

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 5 Oct 2006 21:20

It looks like it's an Ancestry fault...you'll need to contact them. Reg

Jeanette

Jeanette Report 5 Oct 2006 21:20

not sure what you want what is the page and folio number for RG13 4483 why do you need to look at that? when they are on RG13 4479 91 29 Jeanette

Tox

Tox Report 5 Oct 2006 21:21

Thanks jools, never come across this before, hope they rectify it soon. Regards Tox

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 5 Oct 2006 21:22

Jeanette, When one clicks on 'view image' the result is a totally different piece from that whose details are transcribed.......... Reg

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 5 Oct 2006 21:22

If you click on View Record when you search for the name, you will see that the image they are actually on should be RG13/4479, folio 91, page 29. I don't know why the wrong page comes up, but if you go onto the 1901 census and type in these new numbers the family should come up. Kath. x

Tox

Tox Report 5 Oct 2006 21:29

They don't Cath, I have tried it, it must be an Ancestry fault. Regards Tox