Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1841 Census Look Up REVISED
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 15:46 |
|
Still looking for John Samuel POOLE on the 1841 census, possibly with his parents James & Ann. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 15:55 |
|
Just adding another small bit of info. |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 22 Nov 2007 15:58 |
|
I this possibly his marriage? Would tie in with the birth of Emma. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 16:06 |
|
Thanks Keith, its definately possible but I was thinking they might have married before the birth of France (francis?) William, age 13 on the 51 census . John and Elizabeth might have had older children given their ages on the 51. |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 22 Nov 2007 16:11 |
|
Selena, Frances is recorded as a servant on the 1851 census. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 16:15 |
|
Thanks, so Frances William is a girl! LOL. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 16:27 |
|
Here is Charles and Charlotte on the 41 mistranscribed as Cool. I |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 22 Nov 2007 16:36 |
|
Selena, I suspect they were not married to each other in 1841, cannot see John Samuel, and cannot identify which Elizabeth he married. If you got Emmas birth cert, it would give you the mothers maiden name possibly enabling her to be traced in 1841. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 16:37 |
|
I am off out to a lantern parade (!) now with kids but will check back later to see if any kind soul can find John and daughter Frances on the 1841. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 16:47 |
|
Thank you keith, we were typing and thinking the same thing at same time. |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 22 Nov 2007 17:20 |
|
Selena, Frances William was not their child in 1851 she was a Servant and no relation! The only child with them was Emma born 1848. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 22 Nov 2007 19:39 |
|
I'm so Sorry! I didn't see that or misunderstood about Frances William. How many times did I need telling! |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 23 Nov 2007 14:35 |
|
just nudging up in case the day time crew can help. |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 23 Nov 2007 14:58 |
|
Were his parents James and Ann, or John and Ann? Found these possibles for 1841. |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 23 Nov 2007 15:01 |
|
You probably know that adult ages were rounded down in the 1841. |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 23 Nov 2007 15:23 |
|
Sue and Jim, many thanks for replying. |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 23 Nov 2007 15:28 |
|
Now I am confused; |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 23 Nov 2007 15:38 |
|
Okay Jim you're right it could be him but Islington really threw me! Sorry. |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 23 Nov 2007 15:54 |
|
Well that should eliminate.Only John's occupation in 1841 |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 23 Nov 2007 16:01 |
|
That made me laugh - no goldsmiths in our family. |
|||