Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1871 census-missing people
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Looby | Report | 2 Jan 2008 23:41 |
|
i have a fair amount of help from several people on here for which i am really grateful. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 3 Jan 2008 00:05 |
|
Hi Louise |
|||
|
Looby | Report | 3 Jan 2008 00:09 |
|
William Felix Wallan and his siblings all were born with wallan carrington but all seemed to drop it from then on. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 3 Jan 2008 00:11 |
|
Could Willliam have been born just William, don't know if this is the right area. |
|||
|
Looby | Report | 3 Jan 2008 00:15 |
|
Westminster is quite a way from st Pancras or Newington in surrey. (im assuming you are refering to the son) There have been a number of Wallans that were born under st pancras. |
|||
|
Nicki | Report | 21 Jan 2008 05:43 |
|
Is this relevant? |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 21 Jan 2008 06:26 |
|
what is the ref. for them in 1881 census as i carn't seem to locate them spelling "Wallan" |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 07:28 |
|
Hi Janice, |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 07:34 |
|
This was the 1861 census info from a previous thread: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 07:40 |
|
The thread 986652 came up under the search as "Frank A Wallen" aged 30 in 1881 - but when I look at the thread it now says Henry A Wallen. |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 21 Jan 2008 08:42 |
|
Thanks for that Ivy, will now see what Looby has for 1881 ! |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 17:31 |
|
Hi Janice, |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 17:59 |
|
Another possible birth ref for the Leonard above? |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 18:11 |
|
Sar* b 1846-1850 in Bac*rp* offers four alternatives: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 19:05 |
|
- and from 1861 census, there are a few more alternatives: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 20:17 |
|
OK, reading previous threads does help! |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 21 Jan 2008 20:23 |
|
Well Ivy i hope Loobygets back soon after all the work you have done. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 20:23 |
|
Hi Louise, |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Jan 2008 20:29 |
|
Hi Janice, |
|||