Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Stupid Question?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Lindsey | Report | 14 Apr 2006 12:36 |
I know I may sound really thick, but what is the difference if someone is married by banns or license? Lindsey |
|||
|
PinkDiana | Report | 14 Apr 2006 12:40 |
I always thought Banns were read in church and licenses were for non church weddings but I could be completely wrong!! xx |
|||
|
Right said Fred | Report | 14 Apr 2006 12:42 |
I think that you can get married in a church with a licence. I think that Banns have to be read ut in Church for 3 weeks (?) before the wedding but with a licence you can just get married. (?) |
|||
|
Phoenix | Report | 14 Apr 2006 13:01 |
The practical advantage for us of a marriage by licence, particularly if it is before 1837 is that the marriage allegations or bonds have usually survived. Besides the information you would find on a marriage of that period (usually just parish and marital status) you often get age, occupation and guardians for minors. The bondsman is the person who stands surety that you are entitled to be married, so he will be a friend of the couple. You often find that local or family history societies have transcribed the licences. |
|||
|
Anne | Report | 14 Apr 2006 13:04 |
Yes that's right Tom. In the 18th and 19th century people often got married by licence if they wanted to be 'posh'. It meant that their names did not have to be read out for three weeks in church. A licence was/is more expensive so it showed they had money!! A licence would also be required if the wedding was to take place quickly!!! Anne |
|||
|
Lindsey | Report | 14 Apr 2006 13:06 |
Thanks for the replies, I think I understand now. I didnt even know there was two ways! Lindsey |