Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Marriage records
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:03 |
|
Is it really possible for a marriage to have been accidentally omitted from the records? I've lost one, or I'm blind! Bev x |
|||
|
Jess Bow Bag | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:09 |
|
what are you looking for - happy to have a squint if you want jess |
|||
|
Christine in Herts | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:10 |
|
It's possible for any record not to have made the jump from local ROs to the GRO index. It was a manual process, so fallible. Have you tried the local RO? Or, perhaps, they didn't actually marry? Or married much later than you thought? Neither of those is unknown! Christine |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:12 |
|
Thought you'd never ask, lol!!!! Thank you Jess! I have a Minnie Randall, born 1898, who married a Chandler in Surrey, probably Kingston upon Thames. First child born 1922. I have looked through Ancestry bmds for (what felt like) decades either side, and more than once, but can't find the marriage. I know there was a marriage because I have seen the photo! Undated, sadly. Bev x |
|||
|
Smiley | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:23 |
|
Hi Bev, are you positive Joan in 1922 was the first child? Sam |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:26 |
|
As positive as I can be, their first child was called Joan! Bev x |
|||
|
Jess Bow Bag | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:27 |
|
yes, but was she really a Minnie? guess you have checked other options |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:28 |
|
Could this be a possible? Joseph Chandler to Edith Randall Birmingham 6d 710. 4th quarter 1921. A long way from Kingston and not a Minnie I know. Susan |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:28 |
|
Jess, I did wonder if Minnie was her real name, but found her birth registered as 'Minnie'. Bev x |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:30 |
|
Susan I kept looking at that one, and though the time is spot on, the place is way out and Edith?? I'm sure her name is Minnie, or at least I found a Minnie Randall on bmds born in exactly the right place at the right time! Bev x |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 13 Apr 2006 22:42 |
|
If any of you kind people returns to this thread, sorry I have to go to bed now - up at 5 for work tomorrow. Many thanks Bev x |
|||