Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Where Do I Go From Here
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lynda Carol | Report | 25 Mar 2006 09:35 |
|
Where do I go from here? Always thought all the Lacey's were born in birmingham, now from the, below, 1841 census I find the two I am looking for, william and his wife sarah, nee perks, were 'not born in county'. Where should I look for them? Lacey 1841 William 45 Ag Lab Not born in County Sarah 40 Not born in County William 20 born Warks Ann 15 Warks Thomas 15 born Warks George 13 born Warks Joseph 11 born Warks John 8 born Warks Harriet 5 born Warks James 1 born Warks |
|||
|
Suein10b | Report | 25 Mar 2006 09:52 |
|
1851 hopefully the right family Record John Davis abt 1850 Birmm, Warwickshire, England Lodger Edgbaston Warwickshire George Lacey abt 1828 Edgbaston, Warwickshire, England Son Edgbaston Warwickshire James Lacey abt 1840 Edgbaston, Warwickshire, England Son Edgbaston Warwickshire Lydia Lacey abt 1844 Kings Norton, Worcestershire, England Granddaughter Edgbaston Warwickshire Sarah Lacey abt 1798 Chaddsley, Worcestershire, England Head Edgbaston Warwickshire Wm Lacey abt 1820 Edgbaston, Warwickshire, England Son Edgbaston Warwickshire Sarah is a labourers widow message me if youd like the image Sue |
|||
|
Lynda Carol | Report | 25 Mar 2006 09:54 |
|
Many thanks, yes that is sarah, the image is'nt needed but, again many thanks |
|||
|
Lynda Carol | Report | 25 Mar 2006 10:13 |
|
Thank you Peter, no I did'nt have their marrige, so again thanks |
|||