Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
What's happened to it?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jeans Reunited | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:26 |
|
OH......ER....DUR!! claire |
|||
|
Jeans Reunited | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:25 |
|
Panic over! i just tried a different name and it works ok now. Must be a rogue page or something Thanks everyone Claire |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:24 |
|
It's because her page number is incomplete ''7,dash, dash'' so it's been matched with all the other incomplete ones with a ''7'' in!! And it was 1850 not 1851 lol Merry |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:24 |
|
Claire Thats because the page number for that entry is ''7__'' (ie two digits were illegible to the transcriber). Therefore, when you click to see the other names on the page, you get everyone whose page number was also illegible, but who married in that district and quarter! Richard |
|||
|
Debby | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:20 |
|
LOL - it's 1850 same name as above! There are 18 entries and 10 of those are women so some missing too! Debby |
|||
|
Jeans Reunited | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:17 |
|
hi merry try this Mary Gifford december 1851 Thanet Kent Claire |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:14 |
|
Can you give an example?? Merry |
|||
|
Jeans Reunited | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:12 |
|
thanks Debbie do you see what I mean? It's going to take ages to plough through that lot! Claire |
|||
|
Debby | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:08 |
|
Something is wrong then as I had 16 when I just checked a record! Debby |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:05 |
|
Before 1852, if everyone is transcribed, there should be 8 people to a page. Dropped to 4 to a page in 1852. Hope this helps! Merry |
|||
|
Debby | Report | 23 Oct 2005 14:04 |
|
Is it the same years you're looking at? The earlier years had a lot more entries to the page than later years. Debby |
|||
|
Jeans Reunited | Report | 23 Oct 2005 13:51 |
|
When i use Ancestry to look for marriages it shows the matches but then when I click 'to see others on page' there are lots of possible spouses. There only used to be 4 or 6 before. Is this happening to anyone else Claire |
|||