Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Your opinions on an 1837 ref please - it's a free
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Smiley | Report | 29 Sep 2005 18:43 |
|
Hi, this one's hard to read, hence it being free of course, but it's 1974! |
|||
|
Smiley | Report | 29 Sep 2005 18:44 |
|
It's a marriage: Dec 1974 THOMAS (surname) christian name: Kerry marrying CROSS I'm passing this info onto someone else, I want to make sure it's correct. What happens when it's not possible to read the ref on 1837? Thanks for your help Sam |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 29 Sep 2005 18:53 |
|
Can you not go to a local library and see if they have the gro index? As you know the qtr, etc it shouldn't take too long. I looked at the page and wouldn't even hazard a guess. Sorry Rachel |
|||
|
Fiona | Report | 29 Sep 2005 18:54 |
|
Cross page is a bit better but not much!! Ploughley Vol 20 Page 2(4)?39 Angela M. Cross |
|||
|
Smiley | Report | 29 Sep 2005 18:55 |
|
Blimey.. I am a Numpty sometimes, I just realised that as it's a marriage so I can cross reference it with the spouses name!! It's Ploughley - 20 2139 Even then the 1 is debatable Still appreciate someone else looking Sam Thanks Rachel & Fiona. Fiona, I think it's a 1 rather than a 4, comparing it to a 4 below their 4's are done the other way, rather than the typed way... if you know what I mean :) |
|||
|
Fiona | Report | 29 Sep 2005 19:00 |
|
Just been looking at the numbers up and down the page, definately not a 4, looks like a 1 given the angle of the bit and it is a bit that we can see. Fiona. |
|||
|
Fiona | Report | 29 Sep 2005 19:01 |
|
LOL I agree Sam, looks like you can study a page quicker than me. |
|||
|
Smiley | Report | 29 Sep 2005 20:49 |
|
Thanks for your help Fiona :) |
|||
|
Deanna | Report | 29 Sep 2005 21:05 |
|
Always worth a try isn't it? I found a marriage on a free view once. Deanna |
|||
|
Christine in Herts | Report | 29 Sep 2005 23:05 |
|
I only found my own marriage on 1837Online by cross-referencing from my husband's name - my name had been mistranscribed with OU in the middle where it should have been EN!!! My father's writing was flamboyant but not very easy to read. As it was he who took the service, it was his writing in the register, so I suppose I shouldn't be astonished. Christine |
|||