Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

confirmation of what it looks like to me 1837

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Maureen

Maureen Report 23 Aug 2005 17:39

Could someone please be kind enough to look up a marriage of Sarah Ann Tinkler Dec qtr 1850 and tell me what they think the name of the place was, and also confirm that i have the numbers correct 111 220. Or is there any way i can find out what area this was by the numbers? many thanks maureen

Judith

Judith Report 23 Aug 2005 17:56

It looks like ??lington to me and the ref is III 220 (ie district 3 (in roman numerals) page 220 Searching Freebmd for vol 3 page 220 Dec 1850 got these results: Marriages Dec 1850 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bassett John Islington 3 220 Ninham Harriet Islington 3 220 So looks like Sarah also married in Islington but hasn't been transcribed by Freebmd yet.

Maureen

Maureen Report 23 Aug 2005 18:19

Thanks I am looking for a marriage with a lady of that name, Sarah Ann Tinkler and William Smith. Like you, i thought it said Islington, looked up William and found him as well with the ref Islington !!! 220,, so sent off for the cert, i left the females name off as on the census sometimes she is Sarah Ann and other times Ann and got a cert back for William Smith and Penelope Forrester. I am befuddled!! Maureen

Linda

Linda Report 24 Aug 2005 01:06

Maureen - I think I have found your william Smith on Ancestry and they give the volume as 3 but the page as 228 not 220. The register entry on 1837 is not at all clear in the case of William Smith or Sarah Ann Tinkler, but the last number in each case could!! be 8 not 0. The place in both cases appears to be Islington.

Researching:
Wallace, Vaux, Balcombe, Fox, Jago, Cannon Sussex, Devon, Surrey, Middlesex, Cornwall, Berkshire

Maureen

Maureen Report 24 Aug 2005 01:45

/

Maureen

Maureen Report 24 Aug 2005 01:52

Thanks Linda I will have a go at that, whats another 7.00!! These Smith's are driving me nuts without the handicap of not being able to read the entries on 1837. maureen