Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
WRIGHT
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Janet | Report | 29 Jul 2005 10:03 |
|
Is this the same family: 1901 census Elizabeth Wright Head age 44, William E Son age 19, Thomas G Son age 18, John H Son age 16, Elizabeth A Daur age 9, Agnes Daur age 6, All living at 3 Hackthorpe Street 1891 Census Thomas Wright Head age 40, Elizabeth Wife Age 34, John H Son age 6, James A Son age 4, William E Son age 2, Discrepancy with William age. 1891 ages from original 1901 haven't got original with me (in work - supposed to be working!!!!). 1891 living at 8 Hackthorpe st. can someone look for me please |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 29 Jul 2005 10:12 |
|
1901 census Elizabeth Wright Head age 44 William E Son age 19 Thomas G Son age 18 John H Son age 16 Elizabeth A Daur age 9 Agnes Daur age 6 All living at 3 Hackthorpe Street 1891 Census Thomas Wright Head age 40 Elizabeth Wife Age 34 John H Son age 6 James A Son age 4 William E Son age 2 maybe the first William died and second william is a subsequent son. Are they living in an appropriate place in 1891? (where is Hackthorpe St ..Town...)wothout being able to look them up (birth placeetc ) it hard to tell jess |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 29 Jul 2005 10:20 |
|
The problem is that the son William E Wright in 1891 is 19, so there should be a 9 year old, not a 2 year old in 1891. As the children are written on a census in age order, its hard to believe that the 19 in 1901 should read 12, or that the 2 year old in 1891 should read 9. Have you found a death for the father or for a William E Wright? nell |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 29 Jul 2005 10:24 |
|
Nell, my thinking is 'scribble' because if the 19 year old existed in 1901 he cant have been 'replaced' by one 10 years before DOH! Time to put the straight jacket back on i think- the white van is here |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 29 Jul 2005 10:38 |
|
Hackthorpe St is in Everton/Walton area of Liverpool so they are living in relevant area. Think father Thomas may have died in 1899. Haven't brought paperwork to work with me so don't know which qtr. Just noticed Thomas G (son) Shown on 1901 as being 18yrs not on 1891 census (would only be 8yrs).where is he? |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 29 Jul 2005 10:46 |
|
Is this thomas' death? Name: Wright, Thomas Record Type: Deaths Age at death: 47 Quarter: September Year: 1899 District: West Derby County: Lancashire Volume: 8b Page: 379 |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 29 Jul 2005 10:57 |
|
Yes think that's Thomas' death. Was doing so well thought I had found my rellies. After finding two discrepancies in 1891 not so sure now. The info I have on the 1901 census is my family definitely. Anyone willing to trace back to 1891 to check I am following the right line. |
|||