Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

opinions please

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Tmwg

Tmwg Report 18 Jun 2005 23:04

on a 1901 marriage certificate 'who' signs the bit where it says 'in the presence of' is it family members or friends or both? I'm sure i have 1 family member who I cant place, but another whose name is unreadable!

Heather

Heather Report 18 Jun 2005 23:06

Can be anyone. Usually though it is family or friends.

Merry

Merry Report 18 Jun 2005 23:08

The witness to a marriage can be anyone! They don't even have to know the bride and groom. They are only witnessing that the vows have been taken by the couple and that it is the same couple who have signed the register, and that is all. My friend was asked on the street to go into the reg office to wittness a marriage - she was pleased as she had just come out of the hairdressers and was asked to be in the photos afterwards lol Sarah

Merry

Merry Report 18 Jun 2005 23:10

On my own family history certificates I have been surprised at how often the witnesses were not family. Maybe because a marriage was not seen as quite such a celebration as it is now, so more of a private occassion - family were too busy to attend?? Sarah

Tmwg

Tmwg Report 18 Jun 2005 23:12

thanks guys, that clarify's it, I know these days it can be any tom dick or harriet, just wondered if it was the same back then!

Kate

Kate Report 18 Jun 2005 23:30

My great-grandparents got married in 1899 and their witnesses were definitely not any kind of relative. Kate.