Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Why can't I find him?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Michaela | Report | 28 Apr 2005 17:16 |
|
Henry William T Atterbury registered Sep 1892 St Giles 1b 640 Why can't I find him on the 1901 census? can anyone offer a reason? Thanks, Michaela |
|||
|
McDitzy | Report | 28 Apr 2005 17:17 |
|
Are you sure that you have the right man and that he is still alive in 1901? Sounds stupid, but it's asking a question! ;) |
|||
|
McDitzy | Report | 28 Apr 2005 17:19 |
|
Might this be him?? Bloomsbury is in the St Giles district Name Age in 1901 Birthplace Relationship Civil Parish County/Island View Image Clare Atterbury 10 Bloomsbury, London, England Daughter Kensington London Flora Atterbury 3 Clerkenwell, London, England Daughter Kensington London Henry Atterbury 45 Clerkenwell, London, England Head Kensington London Henry Atterbury 9 Bloomsbury, London, England Son Kensington London Magaret Atterbury 26 Bloomsbury, London, England Wife Kensington London Margaret Atterbury 4 Clerkenwell, London, England Daughter Kensington London |
|||
|
McDitzy | Report | 28 Apr 2005 17:29 |
|
Living at 68 Southam Street, Kensington. Henry Snr is a China Packer. The first daughter, Clare, is actually written as Clare, but I guess that she is the Catherine Atterbury (aged 3 months) with them on the 1891 in St Giles. Margaret is 36 not 26, as she is 25 on the 1891. |
|||
|
Michaela | Report | 28 Apr 2005 17:35 |
|
Thanks Chloe, thats brilliant. I couldn't find any trace of him Michaela |
|||
|
McDitzy | Report | 28 Apr 2005 17:42 |
|
No prob. I am going out soon, but if you want to 1901 image, and 1891 if you want,. just message me your email. |
|||