General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Was this normal practice?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 19 Feb 2009 23:40 |
My point was that the majority of weddings were in churches. You had to have been christened to marry in an Anglican/Protestant church as well as a Catholic church - in fact that held until very recently. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 19 Feb 2009 22:04 |
Just another point here. Maggie says that if they married - this would have to be in a church until the 20th century. This is not true - there have been register office weddings since registration began in 1837. |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 19 Feb 2009 14:39 |
Joan, would a local archives hold all parish records for that county or would I need to get in contact with a specific church to view records. The only research I've done so far is online. |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 19 Feb 2009 12:25 |
Although birth registration was compulsory from 1875 - not all births were registered after that date. I don't know the percentage that weren't but I know of one whole family (my grandfather and his siblings) who were not registered. Apparently (from something I read somewhere) if one child in a family was not registered it was likely that none of the others would have been. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 19 Feb 2009 12:05 |
I was looking at christenings too beef up my info a bit, some of the people on my tree I have yet to research properly and won't even think of sending for certificates for until I've bought all the ones for my direct line. I am looking at buying some of the discs which hold parish information but wasn't sure if they hold any more info than the IGI. |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 18 Feb 2009 22:57 |
Just looking at one branch of my tree and I can only find the daughter's christened so far and not the sons! |
|||
|
Brian(i) | Report | 18 Feb 2009 22:22 |
My father, b1902, was baptised 11 Apr 1926, was married 24 Apr 1926. |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 18 Feb 2009 22:10 |
Thanks for your replies. |
|||
|
LancsLass | Report | 18 Feb 2009 19:02 |
Its possible that the boys may have been christened elswhere and the details have not been recorded on IGI. |
|||
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 18 Feb 2009 18:45 |
I believe, if they married - and it could only be in a church until 20th century - they would have to be christened to marry. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 18 Feb 2009 18:24 |
Thanks maggie, I did think about that so when I searched I left the county blank but can't find any christenings that match the 3 boys, all the other children were done in Lincoln and 3 of the boys were christened together. |
|||
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 18 Feb 2009 18:18 |
Depends. Were they living in the same place? If, for some reason the family had to move away, perhaps for employment, they may have waited to have the children christened back in their 'home' village, or they may not have had the money to pay for a christening. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 18 Feb 2009 18:07 |
I've been looking at the IGI finding christenings for my great grand mother and her siblings, there were 10 of them altogether and I've found most of their christenings but for some reason 3 of her brothers weren't done. Was this the norm back in 1870ish to have some children christened and others not? |