General Chat

*shock* on here ?

I know but it's just a if anybody fancies looking for me cos I can't find.

I have an Elizabeth Batchelor b c1845 Burlsedon Hampshire
she married a Jacob Corbin in 1867 and had son Harry in 1870 when she was then widowed. 1871 she was a general shopkeeper living with her dad in Burlsedon
She remarried in 1872 to George Hunt.
In 1881 she is in Burlsedon a grocer and bakers wife with son Corbin Hunt no sign of George
1901 I have found her in Burlsedon greengrocer shopkeeper with son Harry Corbin
both census state married rather than widowed.

My query is where is she in 1891 as I can't find her or Harry and where is George or when did he die ?

Her 1st husband was in the army in 1861

Trouble was a lot of wives were deserted. Can you give any details re 2nd husband DOB and place if possible

1891 England Census
about Harry Hunt
Name: Harry Hunt
Age: 21
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1870
Relation: Son
Mother's Name: Elizabeth
Gender: Male
Where born: Bursledon, Hampshire, England

Civil parish: Bursledon
Ecclesiastical parish: Bursledon
Town: Bursledon
County/Island: Hampshire
Country: England

Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status: View image

Registration district: South Stoneham
Sub-registration district: St Mary Extra
ED, institution, or vessel: 8
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members: Name Age
Elizabeth Hunt 44
Harry Hunt 21

edit typo

On the image Elizabeth Hunt Head of household Grocer
and Harry Corbin Son ,market gardener

Looks like Rose has found them. Give her a gold star she deserves one.

having trouble with GR today!

Address for them is 55 Bursledon

Thanks Rose for that I have been trawling for ages for the 1891

still would like to know what happened to George

Pat , I don't have any info on George apart from he married her in 1872.

She seems to lose hubby's quick lol

Theres this death

Deaths Sep 1875 (>99%)
-

HUNT George 65 S. Stoneham 2c 31

South Stoneham covers Bursledon, do you think she might just have classed herself as married even though she was widowed?

xx

then again there's this one , same area , but again between the two census'

Deaths Sep 1878 (>99%)


HUNT George 70 S. Stoneham 2c 41

Rose I saw both of those deaths and did wonder but it would make him ( either 1 ) a lot older than her by 40+yrs It wasn't as though she was destitute and needed marriage ( desperate maybe lol ) as her father and brother had a market garden, and she already was the shopkeeper.
Yes I do think she would have put married rather than widowed down if I recall right she did on the 1871 census.

Assuming that George was not more than 20 yrs older than Elizabeth. Left her prior 1881 to lead a separate life & died in the S. Stoneham district.

This brings up the following possible deaths;

Name: George Hunt
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1825
Year of Registration: 1896
Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar
Age at Death: 71
District: South Stoneham
County: Hampshire
Volume: 2c
Page: 56

Name: George Hunt
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1833
Year of Registration: 1898
Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec
Age at Death: 65
District: South Stoneham
County: Hampshire
Volume: 2c
Page: 66

Name: Joseph George Hunt
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1849
Year of Registration: 1907
Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar
Age at Death: 58
District: South Stoneham
County: Hampshire
Volume: 2c
Page: 47

Name: George Hunt
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1855
Year of Registration: 1887
Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec
Age at Death: 32
District: South Stoneham
County: Hampshire
Volume: 2c
Page: 42

Following on from Stevie's reply , if you got the marriage cert for George and Elizabeth, his occupation on it might eliminate some of those, if they can be found on census' ?