General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Great Fire of London, started 02 Sep 1666
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Elizabethofseasons | Report | 2 Sep 2013 21:03 |
Dear All |
|||
|
~Lynda~ | Report | 2 Sep 2013 21:36 |
I loved reading Samuel Pepys' diaries about the plague and the Great Fire Elizabeth, recently when in Cambridge, saw a diary of Samuel Pepys, written in 1665, it was in immaculate condition. It must of been terrible for the poor folk of London :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
eRRolSheep | Report | 2 Sep 2013 21:42 |
In retrospect some would say it was a blessing. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
eRRolSheep | Report | 2 Sep 2013 21:44 |
It was the main factor in bringing the "Great Plague" of the preceding year under control. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joeva | Report | 2 Sep 2013 22:26 |
The 'Great Fire. did not stop the 'Great Plague' in 1665 as the the area affected by the fire was too small. The disease was still prevalent in other parts of the city. |
|||
|
eRRolSheep | Report | 2 Sep 2013 22:36 |
It's widely accepted by both historians and medical researchers that the Great Fire of London played a major part in bringing the Great Plague under control. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joeva | Report | 2 Sep 2013 22:56 |
Thanks for your information Errol but my reading of the history of the fire tells a different story. The number of plague victims at the time of the fire was already dropping in the City of London, which was not the slums, I believe that the slums were probably more to the east of the area. |
|||
|
eRRolSheep | Report | 2 Sep 2013 23:03 |
The growth in the number of victims was in decline - in other words, people were both contracting the disease and dying from it but at a slower rate. More and more people were dying but the death rate was not as high statistically. However, the Great Fire burned down a great many of the city slums, areas where the disease had been rife and thus played a great part in helping to curtail further spread of the disease. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 2 Sep 2013 23:10 |
well it was nothing to do with me - I was away that day |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
RolloTheRed | Report | 3 Sep 2013 10:08 |
The Great Fire was in the City of London and as Joeva says not a slum area. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JustJohn | Report | 3 Sep 2013 10:33 |
How many steps is it up the Monument? Seem to remember it is 113. Yes, lots to see if you can get up. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 3 Sep 2013 10:35 |
I've been to the top of the Monument |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joeva | Report | 3 Sep 2013 12:01 |
You must have only gone to the first floor John ! :-D There are 311 steps tp the top of the Monument :-D |