General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

should camilla get public money.........

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

AnotherCanuck

AnotherCanuck Report 5 Feb 2005 17:24

Hi Lisa, No....Camilla shouldn't get public money, or have any title bestowed on her either, especially if she does marry Charles.

Lisa

Lisa Report 5 Feb 2005 17:24

ok jude hope to chat soon.take care.love and hugsxxxxx(:

Unknown

Unknown Report 5 Feb 2005 17:23

Lisa - no its not below the belt, l've really got no idea about politics. Just thinking 'mmmmm it might be a good idea' Jude sarf wales off to cook sausages and mash - yummy;~)

Lisa

Lisa Report 5 Feb 2005 17:19

i cannot understand though jude .the scots wanted a separate parliment .but the taxpayer had to pay a hundred million to build it find that abit unfair.if they want seperate status then they should have paid for it themselves.(hope that wasn't below the belt.sorry!xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(:

Unknown

Unknown Report 5 Feb 2005 17:16

You can ask Lisa (((Hugs back))) ermmmmmmm - it would certainly be worth trying a seperate governent, like Scotland:o) jude sarf wales x

Lisa

Lisa Report 5 Feb 2005 17:16

does there transport get paid out of their pocket or taxes.just look how much we would save .but there again how much tourism would we losexxxxx(:

Guinevere

Guinevere Report 5 Feb 2005 17:16

Hi, I can see the point of a Queen as head of state, although my inclinations are more towards a republic. However, I resent every penny that goes to keep the hangers on in a life of luxury. On another thread people were saying we shouldn't send aid to the third world because the money should go to our own people. I'd far rather it went to Africa than be spent by Andrew getting a helicopter to take him play golf at £30,000 a time. Why can't he get the bus? or train? or drive? The money spent on that family could fund a few hospitals and house a few homeless here. Gwynne

Lisa

Lisa Report 5 Feb 2005 17:14

thanks jude.can i ask you would you like a separate goverment like scotland.or are you happy with the present goverment.love and hugsxxxx(:

June

June Report 5 Feb 2005 17:14

It would be interesting to see how much they earned if they got paid for each event they visited, unveiled or opened, like celebrities do. June xx

Unknown

Unknown Report 5 Feb 2005 17:13

l like the royal family on the whole, BUT Camilla should not get public money, nor marry Charles!!!! Thats alright Lisa, your entitled to your opinion;~) jude sarf wales;~)

Les

Les Report 5 Feb 2005 17:12

the Republic of Great Britain and Ireland sounds good to me

Lisa

Lisa Report 5 Feb 2005 17:10

if she marries charles.to me they are all spongers and i feel that the royals are outdated.sorry guys!!xxxxxxxxxx(: