Find Ancestors

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Page 1 + 1 of 2

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 157 Send Message	Tasha	Report	22 Oct 2008 11:24
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 157 Send Message	HI CHRISTINE, ah there is another frederick around the same time then... no certificate for them as yet, we are off on hol mon so ill order them when i return. thanks for helping. tasha x
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 157 Send Message	Tasha	Report	22 Oct 2008 12:31
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 157 Send Message	HI, ive just re ordered the cert as i rang gro they said i had typed an error so just ordered again. now im worried its wrong and the above frederick howard 4b 321 could be the one im after if he was born before his parents wed. as i have there marriage down as 2nd Q 1887. frederick was born 1876! even more confusion now.. tasha x
Member Since: March 2006 Posts: 5 276 Send Message	ChristineinPortugal	Report	22 Oct 2008 17:52
Member Since: March 2006 Posts: 5 276 Send Message	Hi Tasha, My personal opinion is that the one registered as Dorman is probably the correct one, he could still have been registered in that name although they weren't married. I only looked for another possible one because you said they couldn't find the other one. By the way William and Elizabeths marriage was 1877 not 1887 as you put above. Good luck and let us know the outcome please. Christine

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.