| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Natasha
|
Report
|
2 Nov 2009 21:26 |
|
Hi I am unsure as to when he passed away. He was still alive in 1961 as that is when my nan and granddad spilt up.
When I have a little more time at the weekend I will search the death records.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
1 Nov 2009 00:24 |
|
So all the children were registered in the name of Sanson and Edmonds, indicating a child of Edmonds not married to the mother. I never found a Lavinia, but no matter.
census search results 1911 address search redefine current search Name Relation Condition/ Yrs married Sex Age Birth Year Occupation Where Born Original census image
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EDMONDS, Clara Wife Married 23 years F 49 1862 Office Cleaner Kennington VIEW EDMONDS, William Son Single M 21 1890 Engineer Bermondsey VIEW EDMONDS, Maud Daughter Single F 18 1893 Machinist Bermondsey VIEW EDMONDS, Mabel Daughter F 15 1896 Book Folder Bermondsey VIEW EDMONDS, Alfred Son M 13 1898 School Bermondsey VIEW EDMONDS, Lillian Daughter F 10 1901 School Bermondsey VIEW
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RG number: RG14 Piece: 1767 Reference: RG14PN1767 RG78PN62 RD23 SD2 ED5 SN24
Parish Southwark St George
30 Rephidim Street, Weston Street, SE.
census search results 1911 address search redefine current search Name Relation Condition/ Yrs married Sex Age Birth Year Occupation Where Born Original census image
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EDMONDS, Alfred Head Married M 52 1859 Wood Turner Buckshamshrie VIEW EDMONDS, Elizabeth Wife Married 18 years F 44 1867 Sussex Hastoyers VIEW EDMONDS, Winifred Daughter Single F 17 1894 Milliner Lambeth VIEW EDMONDS, Albert Son M 13 1898 School Lambeth VIEW EDMONDS, Alfred Son M 10 1901 School Walsworth VIEW EDMONDS, Horace Son M 7 1904 School Walsworth VIEW
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RG number: RG14 Piece: 1804 Reference: RG14PN1804 RG78PN64 RD23 SD4 ED12 SN38 Registration District: Southwark Sub District: Newington North EnumerationDistrict: 12 Parish: St Mary Newington Address: 35 Palatinate Buildings County: London Of course, no means of telling if either of these is the right Alfred.
I think you may be hard-pushed to determine who he is.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 22:31 |
|
And so, Natasha - any more info about Alfred, as per my post above? ;)
His death, that is - do you know when?
|
|
Natasha
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 22:31 |
|
Whooo that sounds like an interesting case hey!
Thank you for making it so very clear. Do you have any ideas how I might find information out on Alfred Edmonds as the only information I have is on Peter Edmonds birth certificate. I have been told that I might be able to look at the electoral register in Paddington for his address at the time of Peter's birth. I think I will need to go to Westminster archives which may be in the future as sadly I am a teacher and not off work again for a while.
Any ideas would be fab!
|
|
Natasha
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 22:26 |
|
As per request.
Peter Edmonds of 1933 (may-jul) is also registered as Peter Sanson. Paddington Mother Brown. The same as Lavinia and Rosemary Edmonds
It would appear that they have been entered twice as Alice Sanson (Brown) and Alfred Edmonds were not married.
My mystery lies with Alfred Edmonds a Labourer from London.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 21:36 |
|
Do you know when Alfred died?
If it was after 1971, there should be a birthdate on the record. Before that, there should be an age. Of course, either one would be accurate only to the degree that the person reporting the info had it right.
Do you know whether he had a middle name at all? Do you have any of the Edmonds-Sanson/Brown children's birth certificates? the question being whether they give a middle name and maybe an occupation for Alfred.
|
|
Natasha
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 21:25 |
|
Thank you for making it clear to me. I was slightly worried my family had done something wrong. LOL. Obviously illegitimate children is not an issue! haha
So back to the dead end of not know anything about Alfred Edmonds a labourer from the paddington area (I think!)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 20:59 |
|
Okay, checked the images, and it wasn't a late registration. The birth of Peter, for instance, was registered at the same time under both Edmonds and Sanson.
This was permitted so that the real father could acknowledge paternity, despite the presumption of legitimacy, as I understand it.
We worked on another such situation here recently. Several children were registered under both their father's surname and their mother's husband's surname. The weird thing in that case was that the mother never married the children's father ... but her eldest daughter did. And we think life is complicated in this century!
|
|
Porkie_Pie
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 20:57 |
|
Natasha, As i said in your other thread
A birth would have two entries on the index/register with same vol/page IF mother and father were not married to each other but the father went to the registry office with the mother to register the birth as his child.
But their would only be one birth cert
The child could use what ever name they liked, their is no such thing as a (legal) name you can call yourself what ever you like as long as you don't use a name/alias to defraud anyone
Roy
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 20:53 |
|
Off the top of my head, and based on other such registrations I've seen, this is what happened.
Your great-grandmother was still married to Sanson when the children were born.
The "presumption of legitimacy" says that a child born to a married woman is presumed to be her husband's child (and must be registered as such).
(Originally, this was to stop men from claiming that children were not theirs and refusing to support them, or disinheriting them. Marriage started as a way of protecting property, and making sure it went to a man's offspring - and that's actually why there were laws against rape, so that men could be sure their wives' children were their own.)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 20:49 |
|
Here, Natasha, I'll do it.
From your other thread:
My grandfather and his sisters have been registered on the birth register under my great grandfathers name Edmonds and their mothers married name of Sanson. Both sets of records have the same volume number and page number so therefore produce the same certificate.
Can 1 person be registered twice under 2 different surnames? Is this the case for unmarried couples? If so what name is this person legally meant to use? Arrr help needed!
Let's have a look ...
|
|
brummiejan
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 09:48 |
|
Most people did not divorce as it was too costly. They either lived with the next partner or married bigamously! Living together was extremely common but generally not mentioned (at least if our lot was anything to go by!). Jan
|
|
Cheshiremaid
|
Report
|
31 Oct 2009 02:29 |
|
n
|
|
Natasha
|
Report
|
28 Oct 2009 09:52 |
|
Thank you for all of your replies. I am now slightly confused. I found a George Brown on the 1891 census and because it had him married to a Lavinia Brown I have followed this root (these people I assumed to be Alice's parents) but you guys have provide that not to be true. I assumed this as Alice Rose Brown later had a child called Lavinia and I assume this was her mothers name! CONFUSED!!! I have also found Stanley birth registered to Brown and Christophers but I have not yet sent for the certs. I will do asap to see if Sanson appears. From the story I have been told. Only Christopher was Alice's first partners and Stanley, Peter (my grandfather) Rosemary and Lavinia were all Edmonds. This is the part I have no information on. My great grandfather Alfred Edmonds and Alice Rose Brown. I can only assume her first husband died in the War as the records would show, but then a later record shows him not dying till 1991. Did people divorce in those days? Like you all I have found no record of a marriage between Alfred and Alice.
I must now change my tree with your new information. Any other information would be great.
|
|
Cheshiremaid
|
Report
|
27 Oct 2009 23:29 |
|
I have found this birth ???
Name: Christopher L Sanson Mother's Maiden Surname: Brown Date of Registration: Jan Feb Mar 1925 Registration district: Southwark Registration county: Greater London Volume Number: 1d Page Number: 127 (click to see others on page)
Edit Ooops this is probably the same birth as Maureen found.
|
|
Cheshiremaid
|
Report
|
27 Oct 2009 23:18 |
|
Possible baptism for Alice....her father George is a metal polisher as on the marriage register...
Name: Alice Rose Brown Record Type: Baptism Date: 14 Feb 1897 Father's Name: George Brown Mother's Name: Emma Percilla Brown Parish: Saint John The Evangelist, Walworth Borough: Southwark County: Middlesex
|
|
brummiejan
|
Report
|
27 Oct 2009 23:06 |
|
I can't find a marriage either - when would you hve expected it to have taken place? Jan
|
|
Cheshiremaid
|
Report
|
27 Oct 2009 23:06 |
|
Marriage details....
Name: John Vernon Sanson Age: 20 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1894 Spouse Name: Alice Rose Brown Spouse Age: 17 Record Type: Marriage Event Date: 23 Aug 1914 Parish: Saint Mary, Newington County: Middlesex Borough: Southwark Father Name: John Sanson Spouse Father Name: George Brown
Name: Alice Rose Brown Age: 17 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1897 Spouse Name: John Vernon Sanson Spouse Age: 20 Record Type: Marriage Event Date: 23 Aug 1914 Parish: Saint Mary, Newington County: Middlesex Borough: Southwark Father Name: George Brown Spouse Father Name: John Sanson
|
|
PollyPoppet
|
Report
|
27 Oct 2009 23:04 |
|
hi possible death for john if he died ww1 only one came up for his name
Military Section Army Forename JOHN Surname SANSON Rank Rfn. Regiment Lond. Military Number 304733 Year Of Death 1918 Volume Volume I.83; Page 439
do you know where alice was born
|
|
brummiejan
|
Report
|
27 Oct 2009 23:03 |
|
This is the first marriage you are referring to:
Marriages Sep 1914 BROWN Alice R Sanson Southwark 1d 43
SANSON John V Brown Southwark 1d 43
|