Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
/death look up please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
martynsue | Report | 19 Nov 2010 22:41 |
|
hello to everyone who helped me sort this out, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 19 Nov 2010 22:47 |
|
I think you mean this one??? |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 19 Nov 2010 22:57 |
|
i have looked at this one on lanc bmd,the children they had do not tie in ,the thomas james i want was married at shardlow ,this is were the first 2 children were born,on free bmd the marriage is there for 1891 in shardlow,7b 717 index number,sorry to doubt your kindness, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 19 Nov 2010 23:13 |
|
If you want the Shardlow marriage then it's Ann Elizabeth Bradley: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 19 Nov 2010 23:15 |
|
I guess this is them? Her name is mistranscribed Edith Alia bit original is definitely Edith Celia; |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 19 Nov 2010 23:15 |
|
If this is the family you require, then perhaps Thomas married twice. Look at the gaps in the children's ages: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 19 Nov 2010 23:17 |
|
thank's for that click, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 19 Nov 2010 23:19 |
|
this is the family in 1901 ,thank's to you both,i will look for ann's death now |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 19 Nov 2010 23:41 |
|
Here they are in 1911, they have been married 13 years then so it proves what Rose said |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 20 Nov 2010 03:13 |
|
Right. Thanks for carrying on for me. I kept getting an error message everytime I posted to explain the second marriage. |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 20 Nov 2010 09:36 |
|
thank's katie for the 1911 census,yes it is them, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 20 Nov 2010 10:01 |
|
hi everyone, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 20 Nov 2010 10:04 |
|
this last reply i wrote appear's to have come up under the heading! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 20 Nov 2010 23:17 |
|
Thomas was birth was registered in the first quarter so probably not related to her death: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 21 Nov 2010 12:19 |
|
thank's for that rose,it was a young age to die if it was not in child birth. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 21 Nov 2010 12:37 |
|
Or complications resulting from the birth. |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 6 Dec 2010 19:47 |
|
nudged for new help needed, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 6 Dec 2010 21:53 |
|
Could this be his death? The age is nearly right. |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 6 Dec 2010 22:02 |
|
thank's for looking katie, |
|||
Researching: |
|||