Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Stuck & needing help please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:00 |
|
Hi |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:07 |
|
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:16 |
|
By the way, looking at image for 1861 there is a Bolton family two doors down, not sure if relevant?? I'm not totally convinced the surname "Tuckey" is transcribed correctly. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:18 |
|
Hi Jan |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:25 |
|
Trying for Thomas to see if any clues but though married 1851 no wife!: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:39 |
|
Thomas married Elizabeth Williams in 1845 in Kensington but I think she died in 1867. I have no idea where she would've been in 1851. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 18:20 |
|
Have you actually looked at the image 1851, because I have to say I'm not altogether convinced by the transcription. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:09 |
|
Hi Jan |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:10 |
|
OK! maybe someone else will have a go, or you can come back when you can access your stuff. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:11 |
|
I agree with jan about the transcription of Tuckey |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:16 |
|
Sylvia, I don't think the first names for the two Boulton nephews1851 look like what the transcriber has put - what do you think? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:18 |
|
Re: 1851 transcription. I would say it's Thomas Tuckey. The capital letter starting the surname is just about the same as that on Thomas and on the Tomlyn on the line below. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:23 |
|
I thought it was a T |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:37 |
|
It is definately Tuckey as I have Thomas's marriage cert. What I am trying to work out is if like it says he is the uncle of my Francis/George than how is he related as if I can crack this one it might help with sorting out his parents. |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 29 Jan 2011 13:33 |
|
Witnesses to Francis George Boulton & Anne Gibbs marriage were Thomas Tuckey & Eliza Collins so its definately Tuckey. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 29 Jan 2011 15:51 |
|
How sure are you his mother was Ann? Have you now been able to check the image, I'm not sure about the sons' names. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 29 Jan 2011 16:53 |
|
I have his mothers obituary & he was the informant, it stated in the newspaper that she was his mother. His other marriage wasn't until 1924 so isn't any help. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:11 |
|
No idea if they are related, but thought it worth posting (even if just to eliminate): |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:30 |
|
Thanks Marie Celeste, anything is worth looking at as you never know if it might fit in somewhere along the line. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:41 |
|
Found this record: |
|||