Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Stuck & needing help please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 29 Jan 2011 18:04 |
|
My hunch would be that perhaps, as you said, she never actually married Charles (perhaps he was married to someone else) but took his name as she had his children. |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:59 |
|
According to Ann's death cert she died in 1908 age 90 so that would make her birth around 1818. On the 1861 census she was born in Slough Buckingham but on the 1851 census she was born Burnham Buckingham. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:55 |
|
Just for reference, this is the Ann and two boys in 1851: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:41 |
|
Found this record: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:30 |
|
Thanks Marie Celeste, anything is worth looking at as you never know if it might fit in somewhere along the line. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 29 Jan 2011 17:11 |
|
No idea if they are related, but thought it worth posting (even if just to eliminate): |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 29 Jan 2011 16:53 |
|
I have his mothers obituary & he was the informant, it stated in the newspaper that she was his mother. His other marriage wasn't until 1924 so isn't any help. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 29 Jan 2011 15:51 |
|
How sure are you his mother was Ann? Have you now been able to check the image, I'm not sure about the sons' names. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 29 Jan 2011 13:33 |
|
Witnesses to Francis George Boulton & Anne Gibbs marriage were Thomas Tuckey & Eliza Collins so its definately Tuckey. |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:37 |
|
It is definately Tuckey as I have Thomas's marriage cert. What I am trying to work out is if like it says he is the uncle of my Francis/George than how is he related as if I can crack this one it might help with sorting out his parents. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:23 |
|
I thought it was a T |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:18 |
|
Re: 1851 transcription. I would say it's Thomas Tuckey. The capital letter starting the surname is just about the same as that on Thomas and on the Tomlyn on the line below. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:16 |
|
Sylvia, I don't think the first names for the two Boulton nephews1851 look like what the transcriber has put - what do you think? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:11 |
|
I agree with jan about the transcription of Tuckey |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:10 |
|
OK! maybe someone else will have a go, or you can come back when you can access your stuff. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 19:09 |
|
Hi Jan |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 18:20 |
|
Have you actually looked at the image 1851, because I have to say I'm not altogether convinced by the transcription. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:39 |
|
Thomas married Elizabeth Williams in 1845 in Kensington but I think she died in 1867. I have no idea where she would've been in 1851. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:25 |
|
Trying for Thomas to see if any clues but though married 1851 no wife!: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lorraine | Report | 28 Jan 2011 16:18 |
|
Hi Jan |
|||