Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Violet PLANT (?) Staffs m. Wm BATES abt 1940
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mary | Report | 27 Oct 2011 16:56 |
|
OK, I've done some more research on the Hodkinsons. I looked in censuses and FreeBMD, and I think they are the most likely family, though there doesn't seem to be any sort of direct link to my family. I expect it was just a charitable impulse on the part of my great-grandparents, helping out another local family. |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 27 Oct 2011 15:21 |
|
I don't think the Tamworth family are the right ones. But I was wondering about the Hodkinsons. Definitely a possibility, I think. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 26 Oct 2011 09:27 |
|
If the daughters were averse to Violet, they probably made sure that she didn't think Frederick was her father................ |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 26 Oct 2011 02:05 |
|
7 children born since Sept 1911. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 26 Oct 2011 01:54 |
|
Mother probably died in childbirth: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 26 Oct 2011 01:51 |
|
If you search for Violet Ms born Cheadle in June or September quarter of 1918 there's only one option: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 26 Oct 2011 00:57 |
|
So all those births in Tamworth including Violets are nothing to do with your family then? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 26 Oct 2011 00:54 |
|
We're a very close family and know pretty much all there is to know. Also, the daughters didn't like Violet. She didn't join the family till she was nine or ten. And she doesn't look like them! ;-) |
|||
|
jax | Report | 26 Oct 2011 00:51 |
|
It would only name her father on the marriage cert (if known) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 26 Oct 2011 00:38 |
|
Well, with the info I'm certain of, the only cert that would make sense to buy would be the marriage cert, and I'm pretty sure she'd give Frederick and Hannah Plant as her parents on that. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 25 Oct 2011 23:07 |
|
Until you find the mother's name, you can't hope to find her death............... |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 25 Oct 2011 23:02 |
|
She definitely wasn't the child of one of the daughters. But the Tamworth family is definitely a possibility. On the other hand, why would they be farmed out so far away? Maybe they were somewhat related Plants . . . |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 25 Oct 2011 22:37 |
|
Large family?....................you say |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 25 Oct 2011 22:35 |
|
The best way to proceed is to obtain the birth cert.........the full names of the parents will be recorded. You can then do proper research on their names |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 25 Oct 2011 22:30 |
|
Hi Mary - I think Flick is onto something with that birth. |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 25 Oct 2011 22:20 |
|
Thanks everyone! Frederick and Hannah were my great-grandparents, Catherine (aged 8 in 1911) was my grandmother. Violet joined the family when she was around 9 and the sisters (Mabel to Lizzie) were older teens or early twenties. My dad says it was never really talked about (which is why he doesn't know if she was ever formally adopted) but he thinks that a large family lost their mother (possibly both parents) and were "shared out" by the ladies of the village. I note she was married as Plant, which might mean 1) she was originally born a Plant and was in some way related to the family, 2) she was in fact legally adopted at some point, or 3) She just became informally known as Plant. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Oct 2011 09:13 |
|
1911 census - household transcription |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Oct 2011 09:09 |
|
This is a HUGE long shot........... |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Oct 2011 09:05 |
|
This may be her death, which gives DOB (as known to the informant), but that's probably as far as you will be able to get......although if, as you suggest, she wasn't taken in by the Plants until she was 9, it's likely that her first name, at least, remained unaltered |
|||
|
jax | Report | 24 Oct 2011 03:26 |
|
What are you looking for exactly? Do you know when she died and where? |
|||
Researching: |
|||