Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Edward Bartlett b.1858 High Wycombe

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

MaureeninNY

MaureeninNY Report 1 May 2012 15:40

I think they might be too. Edward is a witness at brother Horace's wedding as well. He (Edward) seems to have that "thing" where he joins the "d" of Edward with the "b" of Bartlett.

mistranscribed:
1861 census transcription details for: Easton Street, Chepping Wycombe
RG number: RG09 Piece: 856 Folio: 27 Page: 47

Reg. District: Wycombe Sub District: 1 High Wycombe
BOWLETT, Henry Head Married M 31 1830 Chair Maker
West Wycombe
Buckinghamshire
BOWLETT, Ellan Wife Married F 29 1832
...
Oxfordshire
BOWLETT, Edward W Son M 3 1858
Wycombe
Buckinghamshire
BOWLETT, Kate M Daughter F 0 (1M) 1861
Wycombe
Buckinghamshire


Maureen

Maisy

Maisy Report 1 May 2012 15:55

Thank you all for helping me out with this one. At least I now know which family to follow and hopefully along the way I might find the marriage that I'm so looking for!

I came on here today thinking I wouldn't find anything and you've all helped me a lot.

Thanks again
Maisy

**Ann**

**Ann** Report 1 May 2012 16:49

So sorry Maisie for jumping ship, but this site would not let me back on.Just kept getting the error message!

Annx

EDIT.....The marriage I put up earlier Honiton 1892...seems a bit odd....I wonder if you rang the records office with the quarter and year would they take a look at the church records for you to see who he married. I know I would have to!!! Lol