Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
James Wilkinson and Emma mitchell
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Choccy | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:06 |
?? |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:09 |
|
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:14 |
|
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:22 |
Interesting. Maybe that's why went towards Yorkshire if he is from Durham. I'll look more closely at that then. Perhaps if they had children who died before birth that woukd explain why no child until 1901 if they married in 1895. Maybe met in Yorkshire then moved back towards her place of birth here then back to near Skipton again after marriage to have edward |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:27 |
I'm thinking it's still odd that they married in Skipton Yorkshire. And on wedding certificate it has him as 33 and her as 22. A bit out ThT I think. That for him. Unless he was pretending to be younger.. Not unusual to lie about age though I guess. I think you have hit home with this. |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:30 |
If we can get James closer to Skipton in 1891 then I'll think it's all good. His father was deceased on his wedding certificate in 1895 in Skipton. Wonder if they are on the 1891.maybe James dad had to travel as an innkeeper to new pubs like they do now |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:31 |
I am looking ................ |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:36 |
Here he is: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:42 |
Thanks dea. Will just check now. Noticed a James Wilkinson aged 51 in hartlepool dying in 1880 so this may he possibly his dad, long shot but woukd explain maybe why no trace of him |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:46 |
Witnesses were Lewis Preston and Mary Rowling or ramping. It's hard to read marys surname I'm afraid. Maybe Rowling. Definately Lewis Preston though |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:49 |
This will be 'our' Emma !! |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 09:52 |
Ah ah. Just found a wedding of Lewis Preston and Mary Rowling in 1896 think on Knaresborough which is nearish to Skipton. I think thst often happened didn't it thst the witnesses were an engaged couple. |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 10:00 |
I found a Lewis Preston born in Worcester and one born in Yorkshire not a common name Lewis Preston. If its the Worcester one then that woukd be good |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 10:01 |
Think it's more likely to be the Skipton Lewis Preston in 1869 than the Lewis Preston in 1860 from Worcester but you never kniw. |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 11:31 |
Lewis and Mary were both born in Yorkshire - this would be them: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 11:44 |
Fanny + her family had moved into Yorkshire by 1891 so not too far from Skipton? |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jul 2019 16:13 |
Now, I just found that Emma moved up to Hartlepool by 1901 - this was where James had been in 1891 BUT I then noticed that Emma was still at her parents home when she should by now have been married to James !! |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 18:01 |
Mm maybe. Hartlepool woukd work though. She wasn't actually a bannister either was she, a Mitchell, and either James was her step father or her real dD and her mum had her out of wedlock |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 18:07 |
Yes think that's definately her. You may be right about being on two census. As they had no children and she coukd even have commuted between the two although Worcester and hartlepool are quite far apart. Maybe James had another woman with him on census night who pretended to be Emma. Maybe the reason they had no children is because they were hardly together until 1901. And maybe he was a bit of a cad ???? |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 4 Jul 2019 18:11 |
Hi dea |