Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1891 census look-up please.
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joan | Report | 17 Oct 2007 23:08 |
|
Hi everyone, |
|||
|
imp | Report | 17 Oct 2007 23:19 |
|
1901 |
|||
|
imp | Report | 17 Oct 2007 23:23 |
|
This is just a shot in the dark for the 1901 - was there ever a Mabel....?? |
|||
|
imp | Report | 17 Oct 2007 23:36 |
|
Joan, |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 17 Oct 2007 23:48 |
|
Thanks Gail-I'm really grateful. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 17 Oct 2007 23:53 |
|
Hi Joan |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 17 Oct 2007 23:57 |
|
Hi again Gail, |
|||
|
imp | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:01 |
|
Will do Joan, just trying different members of the family to see if I can get them to come up, |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:04 |
|
Hi again Gail, |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:05 |
|
1901 is this connected ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
imp | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:06 |
|
1891 |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:08 |
|
Thanks again,Gail.My Thomas was Thomas S. in the' 81 born Cheshire so that must be him.Does it say whether he is married or not and does it give occupation please? |
|||
|
imp | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:10 |
|
Hi Joan |
|||
|
imp | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:16 |
|
Joan, |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:17 |
|
Wow.This is confusing.The Garnetts might all be Harolds or my Harolds might be living with a Garnett family as there are too many of them to be just the Harolds I think. John the father and John the son seem to be missing but William ,Thomas,Helena,Mabel and Wilfred are there with the mother Margaret.The extras are the William Garnett 42 and Jane Garnett 42 plus probably their children,Lilian,Myles and Stanley.I'd better try looking for them on the 1881. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:27 |
|
Hi Joan |
|||
|
imp | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:28 |
|
But you are right in that there is no John again...he must be popping home from time to time as children keep appearing.....lol |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:31 |
|
Hello again Gail-what happened to the Garnetts? Anyway it looks as if the father John is dead by the 1891,eh? |
|||
|
imp | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:37 |
|
Hi Joan, |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 18 Oct 2007 00:42 |
|
Thanks Gail and also Glitter Baby for all the help.I've advanced quite a bit in such a short while! You did well both of you. |
|||