Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help needed inputting information with no birth da
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MaryPoppins | Report | 28 Jul 2005 09:38 |
|
Hi Lesley, I am still using the old tree programme, as I can't seem to get my head round the new one and as has already been said on a thread some of the old counties are not in the drop down box. All the rellies that that I put in yesterday via the old programme have been placed correctly. Mags:) |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 28 Jul 2005 09:36 |
|
think i tried 00/00/00 (or may have been --/--/-- < NO has to be numbers) could you apply that? silly though isn't it |
|||
|
Pentre | Report | 28 Jul 2005 09:34 |
|
On the old Genes format if I had a date of birth but it was unverified (one I got from the Latterday Saints, or from someone who wasn't sure) I'd put it in and tick the circa box. However if I had NO IDEA when the person was born (especially before 1700) and no idea when his parents or children were born either, I'd just put an 0 in the box. This worked. the new Genes format won't accept that. It insists you GUESS a date before it'll let you input any information at all. I've spent several hours trying different ways to get round this. I don't want stab in the dark guesses on my tree. With a large tree I need an easy way to see which relatives I need to research. As 17th century female ancestors could have married in their early teens, and gone on to have children until the menopause making a wrong guess could throw out all my searches. I've written to Genes suggesting they put an 'unknown' box in, which would solve all the problems. Has anyone else found a way round this? I'd be very grateful for any suggestions! |
|||