Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Best way of marking photos?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Trudy | Report | 26 Apr 2005 17:03 |
Hi can anyone tell me what the best thing is for writing on the back of photo's. Obvioulsy nothing with acid, and pencil fades - what else can I try. Have inherited a whole book of photo's with nothing on the back - am trying to work out who they are and need to identify them somehow!! Trudy |
|||
|
Dorothy | Report | 26 Apr 2005 17:19 |
I've seen some pens specially designed for writing on CD's - I wonder if they might be any good? Di |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 26 Apr 2005 17:21 |
I read the excellent magazine 'Your FamilyTree'. Their Photo experts advice is: 'You should only ever use a soft pencil to write on the back of a photo. Never use self-adhesive labels.' Sorry its not the answer you were looking for. Regards Andrea |
|||
|
Trudy | Report | 26 Apr 2005 17:24 |
Thanks both of you. |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 26 Apr 2005 18:48 |
Pencil was good enough for my ancestors back in the late 1800's, and the names and addresses on backs of Victorian photographs are still very clear after 110 years. I would go along with soft pencil. Janet |