General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1939 population registration for ration books etc.

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

jenVG

jenVG Report 12 Aug 2015 23:07

So - a happy ending - finding two half sisters. What a pity that they were all kept apart by not knowing of their existence!
Jen
x

jenVG

jenVG Report 31 Aug 2015 09:33

Thanks everybody. Don't suppose anybody knows if each individual had to produce their birth certificates to register for ration books? If someone was using the name of a live in partner would they have had to prove that they were legally of that surname?

This could solve a lot of mysteries for a lot of people!

Jenny
x :-D

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o°

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° Report 31 Aug 2015 09:41

Looks as though you had to give your date of birth but doesn't say anything about documents

http://www.1911census.org.uk/regform1939a.jpg

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 31 Aug 2015 11:23

I think it is only fairly recently that people have had to produce documentary evidence of their birth, marriage etc. so I doubt it very much. Lots of people didn't even have a copy of their birth certificate even if their birth was registered. I didn't have mine until fairly recently.

My in-laws managed to get through claiming pensions etc. without a marriage certificate.

Kath. x

RolloTheRed

RolloTheRed Report 31 Aug 2015 14:00

If you are mean and have a rough idea where yr rellies were living then the electoral registers on Ancestry will often do the job.

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o°

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° Report 31 Aug 2015 14:13

Unfortunately the ER's on Ancestry only cover a small area of the county

RolloTheRed

RolloTheRed Report 31 Aug 2015 14:41

Ancestry ER's cover a lot of the population though - Greater London, Surrey, Midlands, West Yorkshire.

Denburybob

Denburybob Report 31 Aug 2015 20:36

Thanks for the info. Though not a member of FMP, I have signed up to receive updates.

jenVG

jenVG Report 12 Sep 2015 17:43

Has anybody any news on the release date from FMP. Do you think we will be able to go into somebody's reord by putting in their exact date of birth or will it be by address? I wish they would hurry up and put us out of our misery!

**Ann**

**Ann** Report 12 Sep 2015 17:56

No news here yet Jennifer..how we search is anybody's guess :-D :-D

It's still on for later this year and that's all they are giving away at the moment..not long now though :-D :-D

Kense

Kense Report 17 Sep 2015 19:19

According to the latest Lost Cousins newsletter, members of FMP's Customer Participation Group will be testing the software on dummy data this week.

http://lostcousins.com/newsletters2/midsep15news.htm#Register1939

**Ann**

**Ann** Report 17 Sep 2015 19:22

Ooooooo thanks Kense...let's hope it's all tip top :-D :-D

jenVG

jenVG Report 7 Oct 2015 22:37

Why are we waitng? Why are we waiting? You know the tune!. Slow hand clap everyone & maybe the unveiling will happen. Maybe the beta version was not proved to be user friendly after all. In the meantime Ancestry are desperately trying to sign us up while we still have some money left.

Lyndi

Lyndi Report 7 Oct 2015 22:41

I read earlier today that release date was October 30th. :-)

jenVG

jenVG Report 8 Oct 2015 08:48

How spooky is that? Halloween weekend!

Bobtanian

Bobtanian Report 8 Oct 2015 09:25

So THATS why Bookers is full of pumpkins.........LOL

RolloTheRed

RolloTheRed Report 8 Oct 2015 11:30

From a commercial point of view an utter waste of time.

Digitisation of old records is very expensive. Ancestry keep costs down by getting the brunt of the work done in China and then having their members clean up the mess by making annotations. Even then it took me several years to have Miss Freckingham correctly entered rather than as Miss F-ckingham!

Most of today's population have a pretty good idea where their rellies were in 1939 although 1940-46 can be a bit of a challenge. Thus the tiny percentage who go in for FH as a hobby will only want the 1939 records for interest and will not fork out very much. On top of that restricting release to those born before 1914 or earlier will even further dilute the commercial viability of the project. There is no legal obstacle to disclosing data for anybody re:1939 and I suspect conditions will rapidly be relaxed once all the early birds have been squeezed.

Quite how a ration card issued in 1939 is to be reliably matched with a death anything from a week to over 75 years at low cost in order to release card details is not obvious.

Meanwhile all of the electoral registers remain available and much may be deduced from them even in quite complex situations. Ay have London and Surrey and are extending their digitisation. My 2c is that unless at some point FMP relax their conditions the 1939 ration card database will be a serious money loser. However given the close financial connections between D C Thomson and the SNP anything is possible.

Census and travel data from Australia and the USA can often be cross indexed with records for the same people born in the UK as the access dates are less restrictive. Given the large scale emigration 1911- this poss. should not be ignored.

The 1939 census was destroyed by arson by persons who were never prosecuted for the action as it was seen to be convenient by some. It had nothing to do with enemy bombing and was no accident. However well before 1939 microfiche technology was in use in the UK. Some and possibly all of the 1939 census was copied to microfiche and this copy or copies was not destroyed in the arson attack as the arsonist was not aware of the fiche copy. No doubt at some point in time the fiche will re appear a Marie Celeste of the archives. Some biographies published in the last 20 years have information which would have been next to impossible to compile without access to the '39 fiche.

**Ann**

**Ann** Report 28 Oct 2015 22:01

Looks like it's Monday 2nd November :-D :-D :-D

supercrutch

supercrutch Report 28 Oct 2015 23:21

That's the date they emailed me 02/11/2015 :-D

Tenerife Sun

Tenerife Sun Report 29 Oct 2015 12:34

I think nearly £7.00 per household on top of the price paid for the subscription is too much.

Pricing

Records will be available to purchase for £6.95 per household or £24.95 for our 5 household bundle (£4.99 per household).

As an early 1939 signup, we will send you an exclusive code soon which will entitle you to 10% off our 5 household bundle.


Questions?

If you have any questions, pop over to our FAQ page, or if you want to get in touch, please call us on +44 (0)20 3326 6300 (Mon-Fri, 9am-5:30pm GMT) or email us on [email protected]