Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Any thoughts on this one ?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Feb 2011 18:54 |
|
I have a Mary Shephard b. abt 1842 Foleshill. (9 on 1851, 18 on 1861 censuses). I cannot locate her on 1871 census so looked for a marriage. I have found a marriage on Freebmd registered Foleshill 1862 but there are 5 names listed - 3 female and 2 male. I noted down the name of the two males - William Heydon and William Smith. I also found on the Warwickshire Pink Pages a marriage at St. Lawrence Foleshill of a Mary Shephard to a William Heydon so assumed I was on the right path. However, I still cannot find a Mary Heydon on 1871 census in order to establish any family she may have had. Any brilliant ideas of what to do next ? Thanks. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Feb 2011 18:59 |
|
The Nuneaton entry is here incorrectly: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Feb 2011 19:07 |
|
Two 1871 possibles?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Feb 2011 19:11 |
|
yes brummiejan - they are definitely two possibilities and I will note them just in case. Thank you so much for trying. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 19 Feb 2011 19:35 |
|
This looks like the marriage on Familysearch: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Feb 2011 19:38 |
|
Thanks Madbull - that's the one I thought but no way can I find this flippin woman and her spouse on 1871 census. I will try on 1881 census and if not I'll call it a day. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 19 Feb 2011 19:44 |
|
Could they be this couple in Birmingham? It just says born Warwickshire for them. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Feb 2011 19:52 |
|
It's certainly a possibility and I have made a note of it. I have had a most unsuccessful day today and have had enough. I am also searching for Mary's younger sister Kezia Shephard b. 1852. I have her married 1871 to a George Walker and a possible death 1880. I know she had one daughter Mary Ellen b. abt 1877 but once again there is no sign of them. My eyes are nearly falling out of my sockets so I am giving up just now and will have another go tomorrow. Thank you very much for trying to help. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 19 Feb 2011 19:59 |
|
What are you missing about Kezia? Her marriage is registered in June qtr so probably this one in 1871. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 19 Feb 2011 20:32 |
|
Looks like Mary Ellen was a twin. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 19 Feb 2011 20:46 |
|
Well, it looks as if the birth registrations are an amazing coincidence. As this George married Elizabeth Butler in 1872. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 20 Feb 2011 12:00 |
|
Ozibird - that is brilliant. I never dreamed that Mary Ellen was a twin. In fact the only way I knew of her existence was that because on the 1881 census, she is living with Kezia Shephard's elder brother Eli and his wife who appeared to have had no children of their own. That certainly solves the mystery of Kezia Shephard/walker. Her husband didn't take long to remarry did he ? Then again I suppose being left with two little children presented problems and letting one go to childless relatives was a perfect solution. Thank you so much for solving this mystery. My brain was so befuddled last night, I could neither think or see straight !! |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 20 Feb 2011 20:08 |
|
No, I don't think this is your George and young Kezia. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 21 Feb 2011 11:09 |
|
I too was wondering about the validity of the George and young Keziah found on the two census because of the supposed marriage date of George and Elizabeth(Betsy Ann). I have searched for an alternatice marriage possibly later but have found none. I have also re-checked the two census returns in case there was another Keziah Walker somewhere but nothing. I have also tentatively tried just inputting Keziah with no surname but with year of birth +/- in the hopes of finding Keziah with someone else in the area or surrounding area but have not found anyone as yet. I was wondering if young Keziah had actually died but have not found a death. I did find a marriage for a Keziah Walker to someone called Ison, but obviously I cannot be sure if it is the one on the census or if it is actually the one we are searching for. I have no idea about the possibility of young Keziah being 'adopted' by a Walker family member as I have not investigated the Walker side at all. I was only really doing the Shephard line and found the Shephard/Walker marriage. Never mind, we have given it a good try and sometimes you have to admit defeat rather than inpout what could be incorrect information. Thank you so much for your efforts. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 21 Feb 2011 23:48 |
|
I agree with what you say. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 22 Feb 2011 01:35 |
|
is this any help? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 22 Feb 2011 01:42 |
|
residence: Foleshill |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 22 Feb 2011 03:47 |
|
????????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 22 Feb 2011 07:45 |
|
That's great, Sylvia. It confirms they're not twins. It was just such a coincidence to find them on the same page of the reg'n index. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 22 Feb 2011 08:57 |
|
Sylvia and Ozibird - you little gems. What I wonderful surprise I woke up to this morning and logged on. I am highly delighted to say the least. What a coincidence to have these two born so closely together, and same named father and also being together on the birth registrations. I would never have solved this mystery on my own. Thank you both so so much. |
|||