Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Second pair of eyes required
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kim | Report | 11 Apr 2011 21:54 |
|
Good evening all |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:07 |
|
She may not have been registered as it wasnt compulsory till 1875. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:07 |
|
??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:13 |
|
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:14 |
|
1861 born in Hoxton living in Shoebury Essex |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:16 |
|
Were they definitely married before she was born? |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:20 |
|
Her birth doesnt appear to have been registered |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:23 |
|
Have you got her on the 1851 census? |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:27 |
|
This is the one Lindsey found... she isn't listed on the 1861 with the family.... |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:28 |
|
1861 |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:29 |
|
1851 England Census about Thomas Attrill |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:29 |
|
1851 |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:33 |
|
1851 baptism record on ancestry for Jane Maria |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:35 |
|
Is this the family in 1851: |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:35 |
|
Thanks GB will delete... as I said clutching at straws :-)) |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:39 |
|
Do you believe the 1851 and 1861 are the same family? |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:41 |
|
Vera |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:44 |
|
Maureen, |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:47 |
|
If Martha is 10 in 1861, then she must be a few months in 1851, which makes her Jane. |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 11 Apr 2011 22:47 |
|
In case you need it |
|||
Researching: |
|||