Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
George Crampton b. 1852
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:37 |
|
Hi |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:38 |
|
Date? |
|||
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:42 |
|
George Crampton b. 1852 |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:44 |
|
Sorry, too early still. |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:45 |
|
do you have the right emma? - was her surname WHEATLEY? |
|||
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:46 |
|
What do you mean "too early still" Ozbird |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:47 |
|
??? |
|||
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:48 |
|
Yes Lisa |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:50 |
|
think this could be him in 1901 - dates slightly out? |
|||
|
jen yorkshire | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:51 |
|
hes on the 1901 as abt 1848 Peterborough, Huntingdonshire |
|||
|
jen yorkshire | Report | 27 Sep 2007 20:52 |
|
there are some births ,in the counties he put down |
|||
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:01 |
|
The 1847 one is not correct because I have followed that one through to 1901 so I suppose my only hope is the other one in 1852 but its always worried me due to it not being Peterborough. |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:03 |
|
1891: |
|||
|
jen yorkshire | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:04 |
|
prob is it wasnt compulsory for birth registers |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:04 |
|
The marriage certificate has nothing to do with the time when he was born! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:05 |
|
ps, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:06 |
|
Stamford is just to the north of Peterborough. Looking at the 1891 image, I don't think the pob is Fairford. I think it says Stamford. |
|||
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:19 |
|
its states his age on the marriage certificate Sylvia? |
|||
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:20 |
|
It does make sense Ozi .... i did think that but just needed another persons eyes on this just to make sure that i wasn't wishing it to be that. |
|||
|
LesleyC | Report | 27 Sep 2007 21:22 |
|
You all have been a great help...i am just going to blow my hard earned £7 and bite the bullet even if its wrong....whats the betting that he's illegitimate lol |
|||