Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
The British Newspaper Archive
Read about historical events at the time they were happening. Perhaps you'll discover your ancestor in their local newspaper?
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help with Scotlands People Site
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:07 |
|
Does anyone have access to Scotlands People? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:19 |
|
1895 census ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:31 |
|
Thanks for your reply. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:34 |
|
Sorry, just realised that it should be the 1891 Census. Mary was born in 1895. Slip of the finger. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Reggie | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:35 |
|
Contact the site and advise them of the problem with viewing the image |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Reggie | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:36 |
|
You can't find on the 1891 census a person born in 1895 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:38 |
|
I'll do that now. Thanks for your help. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 28 Sep 2012 00:55 |
|
Thanks for your help people. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Reggie | Report | 28 Sep 2012 09:55 |
|
If you tell us who you're looking for, with accurate date info it may be possible to help |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 28 Sep 2012 13:40 |
|
Hi Reggie, here's what I have. I should warn you that I have been helped before on this site, but nobody could solve the puzzle for me... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Malcolm | Report | 28 Sep 2012 14:37 |
|
Surely you mean the 1911 census. If not, why are you searching 1896 to 1906 if she was born in 1891. Also, if she appears in a census her place of birth should be shown. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 28 Sep 2012 14:48 |
|
If William & Margaret weren´t married until 1896 & Mary was born in 1891, surely she was the child of William´s previous wife. |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 28 Sep 2012 15:15 |
|
Malcolm. |
|||
|
Malcolm | Report | 28 Sep 2012 15:46 |
|
1900 Mary Edward Cook VIVERS born Ruthwell, Dumfries 846/00 0011 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 29 Sep 2012 04:29 |
|
Hi everyone, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Reggie | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:45 |
|
1911 England Census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Reggie | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:51 |
|
They are living at the same address in both 1901 and 1911.......so there's no logical reason to suppose that any child of the marriage was born anywhere else. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Reggie | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:54 |
|
This is the child born 1900................regardless of speculation about naming patterns, she is NOT the child being sought |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Reggie | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:56 |
|
Although, on 1911, Margaret says she has borne a child during the marriage, it may be that Mary was not their natural daughter. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 29 Sep 2012 13:44 |
|
I see that on the marriage record, Vivers has been mistranscribed as Vevrs. |
|||
